Amendment status not verified — confirm the current text below against the official source.
Omitted by section 3 of Uttarakhand Act No. 11 of 2005. [The [Uttar Pradesh]4 Municipalities Act, 1916] [Section 48] (2) Where the State Government has, at any time, reason to believe that,- (a) There has been a failure in the part of the President in performing his duties; or (b) the President has- (i) incurred any of the disqualifications mentioned in Sections 12-D and 43-AA; or (ii) within the meaning of Section 82 knowingly acquired or continued to have, directly or indirectly or by a partner, any share or interest, whether pecuniary or any other nature in any contract or employment with by or on behalf of the Municipality; or (iii) knowingly acted as a President or as a member in a matter other than a matter referred to in clauses (a) to (g) of sub-section (2) of Section 82, in which he has, directly or indirectly, or by a partner, any share or interest whether pecuniary or of any other nature, or in which he was professionally interested on behalf of a client, principal or other person; or (iv) being a legal practitioner acted or appeared in any suit or other proceeding on behalf of any person against the Municipality or against the State Government in respect of nazul land entrusted to the management of the Municipality or against the State Government in respect of nazul land entrusted to the management of the Municipality, or acted or appeared for or on behalf of any person against whom a criminal proceeding has been instituted by or on behalf of the Municipality; or (v) abandoned his ordinary place of residence in the municipal area concerned; or (vi) been guilty of misconduct in the discharge of his duties; or [(vii) during the current or the last preceding term of the Municipality, acting as President or Vice-President, or as Chairman of a Committee, or as member or in any other capacity whatsoever, whether before or after the commencement of the Uttar Pradesh Urban Local Self-Government Laws (Amendment) Act, 1976, so flagrantly abused his position, or so willfully contravened any of the provisions of this Act or any rule, regulation or bye-law, or caused such loss of damage to fund or property of the Municipality as to render him unfit to continue to be President; or (viii) been guilty of any other misconduct whether committed before or after the commencement of the Uttar Pradesh Urban Local Self-Government Laws (Amendment) Act 1976,whether as President or as Vice-President, exercising the powers of president, or as Vice- President, or as Vice-president, or as member;]3