Amendment status not verified — confirm the current text below against the official source.
Repeal and saving 90 li THE . `k?P'41 PUNJAB TENANCY ACT, 1887 fv:ft 1173aTZST 41-4 MTN &f)2 qb,7 Chapter - I : Preliminary agrat Case Law Punjab Land Revenue Act, 1887—Occupancy rights—Exparte proceedings— Mutations—Summons sent to a wrong address supplied by the respondents tenants—Impugned order—Assistant Collector had withdrawn its Exparte order— The very basis of mutation enteries became non est—Order regarding entries of— Mutations cannot be maintained. ; Kanwar Bhan v. Rashid : 2008(3) ALL INDIA LAND LAWS REPORTER (FC) 546 Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 23, Rule 1—Punjab Security of Land Tenures Act, 1953—Civil Court has no jurisdiction to entertain the suit for possession of the agricultural land as the suit for eviction of a lessee/tenant can be filed only before the Revenue Court under the provisions of the Punjab Tenancy Law read with Punjab Security of Land Tenure Act, 1953—The provisions of the those Acts are applicable only in case the landlord wants to eject the tenant from the agricultural land— There is no evidence that the defendants are tenants on the suit land—Once it has been found that they are not the lessee of the suit land, it cannot be said that the present suit is not maintainable in view of the provisions of the Punjab Tenancy Law read with Punjab Security of Land Tenure Act, 1953. ; Gurdeep Singh and others v. Dera Gossian and another: 2008(3) ALL INDIA LAND LAWS REPORTER (P&H) 727 With the enforcement of 1953 Act, plaintiffs, occupancy tenants, claim ownership rights as per provisions of S. 3 of the Act—Jurisdiction—Lower Court decided civil Court decided civil Court had the jurisdiction to try the suit—Plaintiffs prayer is based on the nature of tenancy—Whether plaintiffs were occupancy tenants on the relevant date is the question—Which could be decided only under the Punjab Tenancy Act, 1877—Section 77(3)(d)—Such a decision, if in the affirmative would entitle the plaintiffs to enlargement of their occupancy tenants rights into proprietary rights—And it is the revenue Court alone which can go into the question—Civil Court has no jurisdiction—Trial Court directed to return the plaint to plaintiffs for presentation to the Revenue Court Punjab Tenancy Act, 1887, Section 77(3)(d)— Punjab Occupancy Tenants (Vesting of Proprietary Rights) Act, 1953—Section 10—Occupancy Tenants (Vesting of Proprietary Rights) Act, 1953—Section 10— Occupancy Tenants; Omkar Singh v. Nirmal : 2001(1) ALL INDIA LAND LAWS REPORTER (Pb. & Hry.) 208. Govt. Land in illegal cultivating possession—No rent paid—Trespasser sought to be ejected under Land Tenures Act, 1953—Commissioner found under Section 21 [Act No. 16 of 18871 2 THE PUNJAB TENANCY ACT, 1887 Sections:- 1 - 4 of the 1953 Act, State could not eject a tenant—Further observed that State was competent to eject its tenant under Punjab Tenancy Act, 1887—Made a reference of F.C.—Recommendations of the Commissioner accepted—Punjab Security of Land TenuresAct, 1953—Sections 9 and 24—Haryana Public Premises and Lands (Rent Recovery and Eviction) Act, 1972—Sections 4 and 5.; Amar Nath v. State of Haryana; 1999(3) ALL INDIA LAND LAWS REPORTER (F.C., Hry.) 283.