Amendment status not verified — confirm the current text below against the official source.
Inserted vide Orissa Act 4 of 2009. 15 CASE LAWS Emoluments beneficial interest attached to office of Khuntias and Mekaps - Performance of Sevas and right to receive emoluments - Cannot be altered : Chintamani Khuntia and others v. The State of Orissa and Others : 77 (1994) CLT 11 : AIR 1994 Ori. 46. Sec. 21 - The Administrator of the Jagannath Temple has powers to alter, substitute and provide suitable receptacles for proper collections of Bheta and Pindika offered to the deity in thalis, Parakhas and jharis near Bhitar khata, Bahar Khata and Tatna Singhasan of the temple - Such alterations in no manner affect the performance of rites of sevaks which are purely secular and not religious: Bairagi Mekap and another v. Jagannath Temple Managing Committee : AIR 1972 Ori. 10. Secs. 21 (2) (e) and (f), 21 (3), 21(4)m 24(2) - Validity - Powers conferred on Administrator - Do not contravene Art. 19 (1) (f). Held, so long as a judicial Tribunal is given the ultimate power to decide whether any order of the executive authority which affects the right of property of an individual is justifiable or not that statutory provision cannot be held to impose an unreasonable restriction on the right of the property: Bhimsen Gochhakar v. State of Orissa: AIR 1959 Ori. 17.