Amendment status not verified — confirm the current text below against the official source.
(꯱) ꯖꯖꯅꯠꯇ꯭ꯔꯒꯃꯦꯖꯤꯁꯇ꯭ꯔꯦꯠꯑꯃꯍꯦꯛꯇꯅ, ꯊꯤꯖꯤꯟ-ꯍꯨꯝꯖꯤꯟꯕꯒꯤꯊꯕꯛꯅꯠꯇ꯭ꯔꯒꯋꯥꯌꯦꯜꯑꯃꯗꯄ ꯭ ꯔꯃꯥꯟ ꯄꯨꯝꯅꯃꯛꯅꯠꯇ꯭ꯔꯒꯁꯔꯨꯛꯑꯃꯍꯦꯛꯇꯕꯨꯇꯥꯕꯑꯃꯁꯨꯡꯔꯦꯀꯣꯔ ꯭ ꯗꯇꯧꯔꯕꯃꯇꯨꯡꯗ, ꯃꯗꯨꯗꯋꯥꯌꯦꯜꯒꯤꯂꯝꯁꯤꯖꯤꯟꯅꯕꯒꯤꯊꯕꯛ ꯂꯦꯞꯂꯕꯗꯤꯑꯃꯁꯨꯡꯃꯗꯨꯒꯤꯃꯇꯨꯡꯗꯑꯇꯣꯞꯄꯖꯖꯅꯠꯇ꯭ꯔꯒꯃꯦꯖꯤꯁ ꯭ ꯇ꯭ꯔꯦꯠꯅꯑꯁꯤꯒꯨꯝꯕꯋꯥꯌꯦꯜꯒꯤꯂꯝꯑꯁꯤꯁꯤꯖꯤꯟꯅꯔꯕꯗꯤ, ꯃꯗꯨꯒꯤꯃꯇꯨꯡꯗꯂꯥꯛꯂꯤꯕꯖꯖꯅꯠꯇ꯭ꯔꯒꯃꯦꯖꯤꯁꯇ꯭ꯔꯦꯠꯑꯗꯨꯅꯃꯍꯥꯛꯀꯤꯃꯃꯥꯡꯗꯊꯕꯛꯇꯧꯔꯝꯕꯃꯤꯑꯣꯏꯑꯗꯨꯅꯑꯁꯨꯝꯅꯔꯦꯀꯣꯔ ꯭ ꯗ ꯇꯧꯈꯤꯕꯄ ꯭ ꯔꯃꯥꯟꯑꯗꯨꯒꯤꯃꯇꯨꯡꯏꯟꯅꯊꯕꯛꯇꯧꯕꯌꯥꯏ, ꯅꯠꯇ꯭ꯔꯒꯃꯍꯥꯛꯀꯤꯃꯃꯥꯡꯗꯊꯕꯛꯇꯧꯔꯝꯕꯃꯤꯑꯣꯏꯑꯗꯨꯅꯁꯔꯨꯛꯈꯔ ꯔꯦꯀꯣꯔ ꯭ ꯗꯇꯧꯕꯌꯥꯏꯑꯃꯁꯨꯡꯁꯔꯨꯛꯈꯔꯃꯁꯥꯃꯛꯅꯔꯦꯀꯣꯔ ꯭ ꯗꯇꯧꯕꯌꯥꯏ꯫ ꯃꯦꯖꯤꯁꯇ꯭ꯔꯦꯠꯅ ꯂꯣꯏꯁꯤꯟꯕꯉꯝꯗꯕ ꯀꯦꯁꯁꯤꯡꯗ ꯆꯠꯅ-ꯀꯥꯡꯂꯣꯟꯁꯤꯡ ꯆꯠꯅꯍꯟꯒꯗꯕꯅꯤ꯫ ꯊꯤꯖꯤꯟ-ꯍꯨꯝꯖꯤꯟꯕꯒꯤ ꯊꯕꯛꯅꯠꯇ꯭ꯔꯒ ꯋꯥꯌꯦꯜꯍꯧꯈ꯭ꯔꯕ ꯃꯇꯨꯡꯗ ꯃꯦꯖꯤꯁꯇ꯭ꯔꯦꯠꯅꯀꯦꯁ ꯇꯧꯒꯗꯕꯅꯤꯍꯥꯏꯅ ꯂꯧꯔꯛꯄꯃꯇꯝꯗ ꯊꯧꯁꯤꯜꯒꯤꯊꯧꯑꯣꯡ꯫ ꯁꯦꯟꯌꯦꯛ, ꯁ ꯭ ꯇꯥꯝꯞ-ꯂꯣ ꯅꯠꯇ꯭ꯔꯒꯂꯟ-ꯊꯨꯝꯒꯤ ꯃꯥꯌꯣꯛꯇꯂꯩꯕꯃꯔꯥꯜꯒꯤ ꯃꯇꯥꯡꯗꯃꯃꯥꯡꯗꯃꯔꯥꯜ ꯁꯤꯈ꯭ꯔꯕ ꯃꯤꯑꯣꯏꯁꯤꯡꯗꯋꯥꯌꯦꯜ ꯆꯠꯊꯕ꯫ ꯃꯦꯖꯤꯁ ꯭ ꯇ꯭ꯔꯦꯠꯅ ꯃꯇꯤꯛꯆꯥꯕꯆꯥꯡꯗ ꯁꯥꯊꯤꯕꯋꯥꯌꯦꯜꯄꯤꯕ ꯉꯝꯗꯕꯃꯇꯝꯗ ꯆꯠꯅꯀꯥꯡꯂꯣꯟ꯫ ꯃꯦꯖꯤꯁꯇ꯭ꯔꯦꯠꯑꯃꯅ ꯁꯔꯨꯛꯈꯔꯑꯃꯁꯨꯡ ꯑꯇꯣꯞꯄꯑꯃꯅ ꯁꯔꯨꯛꯈꯔꯔꯦꯀꯣꯔ ꯭ ꯗ ꯇꯧꯈꯤꯕꯄ ꯭ ꯔꯃꯥꯟꯒꯤ ꯃꯈꯥꯄꯣꯜꯂꯤꯕ ꯅꯠꯇ꯭ꯔꯒꯊꯥꯖꯕꯄꯤꯕ ꯫ 114 Provided that if the succeeding Judge or Magistrate is of the opinion that further examination of any of the witnesses whose evidence has already been recorded is necessary in the interests of justice, he may re-summon any such witness, and after such further examination, cross-examination and re-examination, if any, as he may permit, the witness shall be discharged. (2) When a case is transferred under the provisions of this Sanhita from one Judge to another Judge or from one Magistrate to another Magistrate, the former shall be deemed to cease to exercise jurisdiction therein, and to be succeeded by the latter, within the meaning of sub-section (1). (3) Nothing in this section applies to summary trials or to cases in which proceedings have been stayed under section 361 or in which proceedings have been submitted to a superior Magistrate under section 364.