Bare ActsThe Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (Draft stage of translated version)

Section ꯳꯴꯶

Amendment status not verified — confirm the current text below against the official source.

(꯱) ꯊꯤꯖꯤꯟ-ꯍꯨꯝꯖꯤꯟꯕꯒꯤꯊꯕꯛꯅꯠꯇ꯭ꯔꯒꯋꯥꯌꯦꯜꯈꯨꯗꯤꯡꯃꯛꯇ, ꯋꯥꯌꯦꯜꯁꯪꯅꯃꯔꯝꯁꯤꯡꯆꯦꯖꯟꯅꯕꯃꯇꯨꯡꯇꯥꯔꯛꯄ ꯅꯨꯃꯤꯠꯑꯗꯨꯒꯤꯃꯊꯛꯇꯂꯦꯞꯊꯣꯛꯈꯤꯕꯑꯗꯨꯃꯊꯧꯇꯥꯏꯍꯥꯏꯅꯂꯧꯗ꯭ꯔꯕꯗꯤ, ꯁꯔꯨꯛꯌꯥꯔꯤꯕꯁꯥꯈꯤꯄꯨꯝꯅꯃꯛꯌꯦꯡꯁꯤꯟꯕ ꯉꯝꯗ꯭ꯔꯤꯐꯥꯎꯕꯊꯕꯛꯊꯧꯔꯝꯁꯤꯡꯑꯗꯨꯅꯨꯃꯤꯠꯈꯨꯗꯤꯡꯒꯤꯃꯈꯥꯆꯠꯊꯒꯅꯤ꯫ ꯑꯗꯨꯝꯑꯣꯏꯅꯃꯛꯊꯤꯖꯤꯟ-ꯍꯨꯝꯖꯤꯟꯕꯒꯤꯊꯕꯛꯅꯠꯇ꯭ꯔꯒꯋꯥꯌꯦꯜꯑꯁꯤꯚꯥꯔꯇꯤꯌꯅ꯭ꯌꯥꯏꯁꯟꯍꯤꯇꯥ, ꯲꯰꯲꯳ꯒꯤꯁꯦꯛꯁꯟ꯶꯴, ꯁꯦꯛꯁꯟ꯶꯵, ꯁꯦꯛꯁꯟ꯶꯶, ꯁꯦꯛꯁꯟ꯶꯷, ꯁꯦꯛꯁꯟ꯶꯸, ꯁꯦꯛꯁꯟ꯷꯰ꯅꯠꯇ꯭ꯔꯒꯁꯦꯛꯁꯟ꯷꯱ꯒꯤꯃꯈꯥꯗꯂꯩꯕꯃꯔꯥꯜꯑꯃꯒ ꯃꯔꯤꯂꯩꯅꯕꯃꯇꯝꯗꯊꯤꯖꯤꯟ-ꯍꯨꯝꯖꯤꯟꯕꯒꯤꯊꯕꯛꯅꯠꯇ꯭ꯔꯒꯋꯥꯌꯦꯜꯑꯗꯨꯃꯔꯥꯜꯁꯤꯕꯒꯤꯆꯦꯖꯦꯠꯑꯗꯨꯊꯥꯑꯅꯤꯒꯤꯃꯅꯨꯡꯗ ꯂꯣꯏꯁꯤꯟꯒꯅꯤ꯫ (꯲) ꯀꯔꯤꯒꯨꯝꯕꯋꯥꯌꯦꯜꯁꯪꯑꯗꯨꯅꯃꯔꯥꯜꯂꯩꯕꯒꯤꯃꯇꯥꯡꯗꯈꯪꯂꯕꯃꯇꯨꯡꯗ, ꯅꯠꯇ꯭ꯔꯒꯋꯥꯌꯦꯜꯆꯠꯊꯕꯍꯧꯔꯕꯃꯇꯨꯡꯗ, ꯊꯤꯖꯤꯟ-ꯍꯨꯝꯖꯤꯟꯕꯒꯤꯊꯕꯛꯅꯠꯇ꯭ꯔꯒꯋꯥꯌꯦꯜꯆꯠꯊꯕꯑꯃꯍꯦꯛꯇꯒꯤꯊꯕꯛꯍꯧꯗꯣꯛꯄ, ꯅꯠꯇ꯭ꯔꯒꯂꯦꯞꯍꯟꯕꯃꯊꯧꯇꯥꯏꯅꯠꯇ꯭ꯔꯒ ꯄꯥꯎꯇꯥꯛꯄꯤꯕꯑꯣꯏꯔꯕꯗꯤ, ꯃꯇꯝ-ꯃꯇꯝꯒꯤꯑꯣꯏꯅ, ꯔꯦꯀꯣꯔ ꯭ ꯗꯇꯧꯒꯗꯕꯃꯔꯝꯁꯤꯡꯒꯤꯃꯇꯨꯡꯏꯟꯅ, ꯃꯍꯥꯛꯅꯃꯇꯤꯛꯆꯥꯕꯅꯤ ꯍꯥꯏꯅꯂꯧꯔꯤꯕꯃꯇꯝꯑꯗꯨꯒꯤꯗꯃꯛꯇ, ꯃꯗꯨꯂꯦꯞꯍꯟꯕꯅꯠꯇ꯭ꯔꯒꯂꯦꯞꯍꯟꯕꯌꯥꯏ, ꯑꯃꯁꯨꯡꯀꯔꯤꯒꯨꯝꯕꯀꯁꯇꯗꯤꯗꯂꯩꯔꯕꯗꯤꯃꯔꯥꯜ ꯂꯩꯕꯃꯤꯑꯣꯏꯑꯗꯨꯕꯨꯋꯥꯔꯦꯟ꯭ꯇꯑꯃꯒꯤꯈꯨꯠꯊꯥꯡꯗꯔꯤꯃꯥꯟꯗꯊꯝꯕꯌꯥꯏ꯫ ꯄꯤꯔꯤꯕꯋꯥꯐꯝꯗꯤꯋꯥꯌꯦꯜꯁꯪꯑꯃꯠꯇꯅꯃꯔꯥꯜꯂꯩꯕꯃꯤꯑꯣꯏꯑꯃꯥꯕꯨꯁꯦꯛꯁꯟꯑꯁꯤꯒꯤꯃꯈꯥꯗꯃꯇꯝꯑꯃꯗꯅꯨꯃꯤꯠꯇꯔꯥꯃꯉꯥꯅꯤ ꯍꯦꯟꯕꯒꯤꯑꯣꯏꯅꯐꯥꯖꯤꯟꯗꯨꯅꯊꯝꯕꯌꯥꯔꯣꯏ꯫ ꯃꯈꯥꯇꯥꯅꯄꯤꯔꯤꯕꯋꯥꯐꯝꯗꯤꯍꯛꯊꯦꯡꯅꯅꯎꯔꯤꯕꯃꯤꯑꯣꯏꯁꯤꯡꯅꯁꯔꯨꯛꯌꯥꯔꯤꯉꯩꯃꯇꯝꯗ, ꯃꯈꯣꯏꯕꯨꯆꯥꯡꯌꯦꯡꯇꯧꯗꯅ, ꯍꯛꯊꯦꯡꯅꯅꯑꯏꯕꯑꯣꯏꯅꯆꯦꯖꯟꯅꯕꯑꯀꯛꯅꯕꯃꯔꯝꯁꯤꯡꯅꯠꯇꯅ, ꯂꯦꯞꯊꯣꯛꯄꯅꯠꯇ꯭ꯔꯒꯂꯦꯞꯊꯣꯛꯄꯑꯃꯠꯇꯄꯤꯔꯣꯏ꯫ ꯄꯤꯔꯤꯕꯋꯥꯐꯝꯗꯤꯃꯔꯥꯜꯂꯩꯕꯃꯤꯑꯣꯏꯑꯗꯨꯅꯃꯍꯥꯛꯀꯤꯃꯊꯛꯇꯄꯤꯔꯛꯀꯗꯧꯔꯤꯕꯋꯥꯌꯦꯜꯑꯗꯨꯒꯤꯃꯥꯌꯣꯛꯇꯃꯔꯝꯎꯠꯄ ꯉꯝꯍꯟꯕꯈꯛꯇꯒꯤꯄꯥꯟꯗꯝꯒꯤꯗꯃꯛꯂꯦꯞꯊꯣꯛꯅꯕꯑꯃꯠꯇꯄꯤꯔꯣꯏ꯫ 105 Provided also that— (a) no adjournment shall be granted at the request of a party, except where the circumstances are beyond the control of that party; (b) where the circumstances are beyond the control of a party, not more than two adjournments may be granted by the Court after hearing the objections of the other party and for the reasons to be recorded in writing; (c) the fact that the advocate of a party is engaged in another Court, shall not be a ground for adjournment; (d) where a witness is present in Court but a party or his advocate is not present or the party or his advocate though present in Court, is not ready to examine or cross-examine the witness, the Court may, if thinks fit, record the statement of the witness and pass such orders as it thinks fit dispensing with the examination-in-chief or cross-examination of the witness, as the case may be. Explanation 1.—If sufficient evidence has been obtained to raise a suspicion that the accused may have committed an offence, and it appears likely that further evidence may be obtained by a remand, this is a reasonable cause for a remand. Explanation 2.—The terms on which an adjournment or postponement may be granted include, in appropriate cases, the payment of costs by the prosecution or the accused.

Section ꯳꯴꯶ – The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (Draft stage of translated version) | DailyLaw.ai