Amendment status not verified — confirm the current text below against the official source.
(꯱) ꯀꯔꯤꯒꯨꯝꯕꯑꯦꯛ ꯭ ꯠꯑꯃꯈꯛꯇꯅꯠꯇ꯭ꯔꯒꯑꯦꯛꯠꯁꯤꯡꯒꯤꯄꯔꯤꯡꯑꯃꯅꯑꯁꯤꯒꯨꯝꯕꯃꯑꯣꯡꯒꯤꯑꯣꯏꯔꯕꯗꯤ ꯄ ꯭ ꯔꯃꯥꯟꯇꯧꯕꯌꯥꯕꯑꯆꯨꯝꯕꯋꯥꯐꯝꯀꯌꯥꯑꯃꯒꯤꯃꯅꯨꯡꯗꯀꯔꯝꯕꯑꯁꯤꯅꯑꯣꯏꯒꯅꯤꯍꯥꯏꯅꯆꯤꯡꯅꯕꯂꯩꯔꯕꯗꯤ, ꯃꯔꯥꯜꯁꯤꯔꯕꯃꯤꯑꯣꯏ ꯑꯗꯨꯗꯑꯁꯤꯒꯨꯝꯕꯃꯔꯥꯜꯄꯨꯝꯅꯃꯛꯅꯠꯇ꯭ꯔꯒꯑꯃꯍꯦꯛꯇꯗꯇꯧꯈꯤꯕꯒꯤꯃꯔꯥꯜꯁꯤꯕꯌꯥꯏ, ꯑꯃꯁꯨꯡꯑꯁꯤꯒꯨꯝꯕꯃꯔꯥꯜꯁꯤꯕꯒꯤ ꯃꯁꯤꯡꯑꯃꯍꯦꯛꯇꯕꯨꯃꯇꯝꯈꯔꯒꯤꯑꯣꯏꯅꯋꯥꯌꯦꯜꯇꯧꯕꯌꯥꯏ; ꯅꯠꯇ꯭ꯔꯒꯃꯗꯨꯒꯤꯑꯣꯟꯅ-ꯇꯩꯅꯕꯗꯃꯍꯥꯛꯑꯁꯤꯄꯟꯈ꯭ꯔꯤꯕ ꯃꯔꯥꯜꯁꯤꯡꯑꯗꯨꯒꯤꯃꯅꯨꯡꯗꯀꯔꯤꯒꯨꯝꯕꯑꯃꯇꯧꯈꯤꯕꯒꯤꯃꯔꯥꯜꯁꯤꯕꯌꯥꯏ꯫ 81 (2) If in such a case the accused is charged with one offence, and it appears in evidence that he committed a different offence for which he might have been charged under the provisions of sub-section (1), he may be convicted of the offence which he is shown to have committed, although he was not charged with it. Illustrations. (a) A is accused of an act which may amount to theft, or receiving stolen property, or criminal breach of trust or cheating. He may be charged with theft, receiving stolen property, criminal breach of trust and cheating, or he may be charged with having committed theft, or receiving stolen property, or criminal breach of trust or cheating. (b) In the case mentioned, A is only charged with theft. It appears that he committed the offence of criminal breach of trust, or that of receiving stolen goods. He may be convicted of criminal breach of trust or of receiving stolen goods (as the case may be), though he was not charged with such offence. (c) A states on oath before the Magistrate that he saw B hit C with a club. Before the Sessions Court A states on oath that B never hit C. A may be charged in the alternative and convicted of intentionally giving false evidence, although it cannot be proved which of these contradictory statements was false.