Bare ActsThe Madhya Pradesh Rajmarg Adhiniyam, 2004.

Section 35

Amendment status not verified — confirm the current text below against the official source.

Where Ute person on whom on whom nodee 10 remove an cnct()a(;hrnent has been served urder sub-sectioo (l) of section '4 loys claim that 1hr. land in respect of which cn=hmcnt has (4) Where the encroachment is of such a nature that its immedia ~ remove! i:. considered essential in the interest of safety of traffic on the highway or the •~fe,y of any srrueture forming part of the highway and no notice can be served immediately on the p.rson responsible for the encroachment or his representative under sub-section (I) owmg to his rbseoee or for any orher reason. the Highway Authority or the autborized official may, in >tC:diu••n to prosecution of 1he person under sub S"hOn (3). cirh~r'- • (3) If the encroachment is not removed within the period specif~ ~ in the notice and no valid cause is shown for non compliance. the Highway Authority or the •• ~'!or:red officer referred to in sub-section (I) may request in writing to the Collector to re.nov the eecrocchrnem and thereupon the Collector shall take action for summary eviction as :f ti: · marter falls within the scope of section 61. . (2) The notice shall specify the land encroached upon and the t:_nir within which such encroachment is to be removed and shall also state that the failure 10 lY:nply within the period specified therein will render the person liable to prosecution and also io "":nmary evicuon, ,\pp .. t •saln11 ""'""' ......... Removal or

Section 35 – The Madhya Pradesh Rajmarg Adhiniyam, 2004. | DailyLaw.ai