Amendment status not verified — confirm the current text below against the official source.
, 8.122 , ; [i-A] Vakalatnama does not authorise an Advocate in writing to present .the election petition before the Competent Authority. Urmila Devi v.Return- ing Officer (Panchayat), 2008(4) MPHT 410 = 2008(3) MPWN 92. [2] Enclosement of receipt not compulsory in each case.-Rule 7 does not say that an election petitioner is bound and obliged to file a copyof the receipt along with the election petition. If the Presiding Officer receives the security cost in cash and does not issue the receipt immediately there- after, then such a lapse or inaction on-the part of the Presiding Officer or his office, election petitioner cannot be allowed to suffer. Lata Patel v. Smt. Kamlesh Gautam, 2008 (1) MPI.J 388.