Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
BLAPL No.2099 of 2026
Chakradhar Swain … Petitioner
Mr. R.C. Maharana, Advocate -versus- State of Orissa … Opposite Party Mr. M.R. Patra, Addl. PP
CORAM: JUSTICE G. SATAPATHY
Order No.
ORDER(ORAL):06.07.2026
03. 1. This is a bail application U/S.483 of BNSS by the petitioner for grant of bail in connection with Kakatpur PS Case No.253 of 2025 corresponding to TR Case No.10 of 2026 pending in the file of learned Additional District Judge-cum-Special Court under POCSO Act, Puri, for commission of offences punishable U/Ss.137(2)/87/64(2) (m)/65(1) of BNS r/w Section 6 of POCSO Act and Section 9 of PCM Act, on the main allegation of kidnapping the minor victim and committing rape and aggravated penetrative sexual assault upon her by marrying her. 2. Heard, Mr. Ramesh Chandra Maharana, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. M.R. Patra, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor in the matter and perused the record. None appears for the informant/victim despite being duly intimated as apprised by learned Addl. PP. Mr. Ramesh Chandra Maharana, learned counsel for the petitioner, who by filing the certified copy of surrender certificate, which is taken on record, informs the Court that the petitioner has already surrendered to custody. Page 2 of 2
3. After having considered the rival submissions and taking into consideration the nature and gravity of the offences as alleged against the petitioner vis-à-vis the accusations sought to be brought against him and regard being had to the pre-trial detention of the petitioner in custody since 20.11.2025 with submission of charge- sheet in the meantime and the petitioner having already surrendered to custody after availing the interim bail and keeping in view the other circumstances on record in entirety including the statement of the victim and taking into account the inherent right of the accused-petitioner to be presumed innocent until proven guilty at the trial, this Court without expressing any view on merits admits the petitioner to bail. 4. Hence, the bail application of the petitioner stands allowed and the petitioner is allowed to go on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand) only with two solvent sureties each for the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Court in seisin of the case on such terms and conditions as deem fit and proper by it. 5. Accordingly, the BLAPL stands disposed of. A soft copy of this order be immediately communicated to the concerned Court, who shall afterwards communicate the same to the concerned Jail through e-mail for reference. (G. Satapathy)
Judge Subhasmita Designation: Sr.
Stenographer