ZAHIDA BANOO v. STATE OF J AND K TH. COMMISSIONER SECY. SOCIAL WELFARE DEPTT. AND ORS
SWP/2096/2018 · 2026-05-08
Sanjeev Kumar
body2096
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2096 DAILYLAW 2 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2096 DAILYLAW 2 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Serial No. 24 REGULAR LIST
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
(Through Virtual Mode)
SWP 2096/2018 ZAHIDA BANOO …Petitioner/Appellant(s) Through: None Vs.
STATE OF JK & ORS ...Respondent(s) Through: None CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR, JUDGE ORDE R 08.05.2026
1. On the last two consecutive dates of hearings, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Today also, when the case was called out nobody turned up to appear on behalf of the petitioner. It seems that the petitioner has lost interest to pursue this petition.
2. Dismissed for want of prosecution.
3. Interim direction, if any, subsisting shall stand vacated.
(SANJEEV KUMAR)
JUDGE
SRINAGAR: 08.05.2026
“MIR ARIF” MIR ARIF MANZOOR I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document 11.05.26