SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS WPMS No.2096 of 2016 Prashant Dhama …………Petitioner Vs. State of Uttarakhand and another ……….Respondents Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Mr. Abdul Ali, learned counsel holding brief of Mr. Bhupesh Kandpal, learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. Mr. Suyash Pant, learned S.C. for the State. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he wants to withdraw the writ petition for the reason that the writ petition has rendered infructuous, due to efflux of time. 4. Accordingly writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 17.03.2026 SK