Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2089 DAILYLAW 2 (UTT)

NAND LAL v. CANARA BANK BRANCH JWALAPUR DISTRICT HARIDWAR

WPMS/2089/2022 · 2026-03-11

Pankaj Purohit

body2089

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS WPMS No.2089 of 2022 Nand Lal …………Petitioner Vs. Canara Bank Branch Jwalapur ……….Respondent Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Mr. Mohd. Safdar, learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. Mr. Shobhit Joshi, learned counsel holding brief of Mr. Ashish Joshi, learned counsel for the respondent. 3. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner, at the outset, that he wants to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to avail the appropriate remedy available to him before the Debts Recovery Tribunal, Dehradun. 4. Permission so sought is granted. 5. Accordingly writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid. 6. Interim order dated 01.09.2022 stands vacated. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 11.03.2026 SK