Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2088 DAILYLAW 3 (PNJ)

KOMAL AND ORS v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

CWP/2088/2022 · 2026-07-02

Harpreet Singh Brar

body2088

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

229 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-2088-2022 (O&M) Date of decision: 02.07.2026 Komal and others ....Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and others ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARPREET SINGH BRAR Present: None for the petitioners. Mr. Saurabh Girdhar, AAG, Haryana. Mr. Jagbir Singh, Advocate for respondent No.3. HARPREET SINGH BRAR J. (Oral) 1. Prayer in this writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, is for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus, directing the respondents to pay the salary to the petitioners for the vacation period and to direct the respondents to grant the pay scale to the petitioners as per UGC Notification dated 28.01.2019 (Annexure P-7). Further a writ of certiorari has been sought, for quashing the practice of the respondents to relieve the petitioners during vacations. 2. The case has been called twice since morning and despite that there is no representation on behalf of the petitioners. It appears that neither the petitioners nor their counsel is interested in pursuing the present petition. 3. In view of the above, having left with no other option, the present petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. (HARPREET SINGH BRAR) JUDGE 02.07.2026 yakub Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No MOHD YAKUB 2026.07.03 10:09 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court, Chandigarh.