Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2088 DAILYLAW 1 (HP)

VIJAY KUMAR AND ORS v. STATE OF HP AND ORS

CWP/2088/2026 · 2026-02-27

Ajay Mohan Goel

body2088

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 2088 of 2026 Decided on: 27.02.2026 Vijay Kumar and others … Petitioners Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others … Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 ___________________________________________________________________ For the petitioners : Mr. Kamal Sharma, Advocate vice Mr. Jagmohan Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Rajat Chauhan, Assistant Advocate General. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) Notice. Mr. Rajat Chauhan, learned Assistant Advocate General, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. As prayed for, this writ petition is disposed of with the direction that in the event of each of petitioners filing independent representations with regard to the issue raised in the writ petition within a period of three weeks from today, the same be decided by the competent Authority, in terms of the averments made therein, including the judgments, if any, being relied upon therein, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of the representations, by passing a speaking order in accordance with law. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, also stand disposed of accordingly. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge February 27, 2026 (narender) 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?