RAM SARAN v. UT OF J AND K TH. COMMISSIONER SECRETARY REVENUE DEPARTMENT, JAMMU AND OTHERS
WP(C)/2082/2026 · 2026-07-17
Wasim Sadiq Nargal
Writ Petition (Civil)body2082
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2082 DAILYLAW 2 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2082 DAILYLAW 2 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
Case: WP(C) No. 2082/2026
Ram Saran
..... Petitioner(s)/Appellant(s)
Through :- Mr. Faiz Ul Arif Fahmi, Advocate
Vs
U.T. of J&K and Ors. .....Respondent(s)
Through :- Ms. Priyanka Bhat, Advocate vice Mrs. Monika Kohli, Sr. AAG
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE
ORDER 17.07.2026
After arguing for a while, when confronted with the maintainability of the instant petition, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks withdrawal of the instant petition unconditionally, with liberty to seek appropriate remedy under law. His statement is taken on record.
In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the instant petition is dismissed as withdrawn, along with all connected application(s), with liberty as prayed for.
(WASIM SADIQ NARGAL)
JUDGE
JAMMU 17.07.2026 Mihul
Sr. No. 192