Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2079 DAILYLAW 2 (PNJ)

KUSMA DEVI AND ORS. v. FAKRUDDIN AND ORS.

FAO/2079/2018 · 2026-01-27

Pankaj Jain

body2079

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

FAO-2079-2018 [247] Kusma Dev Fakruddin a Coram : Present: PANKAJ J [1] compensati Mewat vide [2] Motor Veh Shankar, w age of 22 y [3] Court in th Pranay Se General In (2018) 18 Transport compensati 2018 (O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF AT CHANDIGA FAO-2079 Date of De a Devi and others versus uddin and others HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PA Mr. Ashish Gupta, Advocate fo Mr. Nafees Ahmad, Advocate Mr. Punit Jain, Advocate for r **** KAJ JAIN, J. (ORAL) Claimants are in appeal ensation awarded by the learned Mo at vide impugned Award dated 03.10.2 Claimants filed claim applica r Vehicles Act, seeking compensatio kar, who died in a motor vehicular ac f 22 years. Keeping in view the ratio of l t in the cases of ‘National Insuran ay Sethi and Others’, 2017(4) RCR ral Insurance Co. Ltd. versus Nan 8) 18 SCC 130 and ‘Sarla Verm sport Corporation and another’, ensation payable to the claimants is re T OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA DIGARH 2079-2018 (O&M) of Decision : 27.01.2026 …Appellants ….Respondents PANKAJ JAIN cate for the appellants. ocate for respondent Nos.1 to 3. for respondent No.4. appeal seeking enhancement of ed Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, 03.10.2017. pplication under Section 166 of the nsation on account of death of Uma ular accident dated 13.11.2016 at the io of law laid down by the Supreme surance Company Limited versus ) RCR (Civil) 1009 (SC), ‘Magma Nanu Ram alias Chuhru Ram’, Verma and others versus Delhi ’, 2009(3) RCR (Civil) 77, the ts is re-worked as under:- 1 t of unal, f the Uma at the reme rsus agma am’, Delhi e RAJNEESH SHARMA 2026.02.12 17:38 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document FAO-2079-2018 [4] appeal stan [5] [6] [7] disposed of 27.01.2026 ‘R. Sharma' 2018 (O&M) Sr.No. Description 1. Salary of the decease 2. Future Prospects 3. Deduction 4. Multiplier 5. Loss of Estate 6. Funeral Expenses 7. Loss of Consortium With the aforesaid modificatio stands disposed off. The rest of the Award is maint Needless to say, anything alrea All pending miscellaneous a ed off. .2026 Whether speaking/ reasoned Whether reportable Amount (in ₹) eceased 8000 per month 40% ½ as the deceased was Bachelor ‘18’ 18000 18000 rtium 48000 x 4 =1,92,000 ification in the impugned Award, the aintained. g already paid shall be set off. eous application(s), if any, stands (PANKAJ JAIN) JUDGE : Yes/No : Yes/No 2 was d, the tands RAJNEESH SHARMA 2026.02.12 17:38 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document