IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP Nos. 2079/2015 & 5246/2014 Decided on: 22.06.2026 CWP No. 2079/2015 Sarita Devi …..Petitioner Versus State of H. P. & Ors. ......Respondents CWP No. 5246/2014 Kultar Singh …..Petitioner Versus State of H. P. & Ors. ......Respondents ………………………………………………………………………………… Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner: Mr. Rupesh Thakur and Mr. Naresh Verma, Advocates, in the respective petitions. For the respondents: Mr. Naresh Verma, Advocate for respondent No.3 in CWP No. 2079/2015. Mr. Rajat Chaudhary, Assistant Advocate General, in both the petitions. Mr. Arvind Sharma, Advocate, for respondents No.6 to 9 in CWP No. 5246/2014. Jyotsna Rewal Dua, J. Learned counsel for the petitioner in CWP No. 2079/2015 states that with the efflux of time, the writ petitions have been rendered infructuous. His statement is taken note of. 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 In view of above submissions, the writ petitions are disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of accordingly. Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge 22nd June, 2026 (rohit)