Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2079 DAILYLAW 1 (GAU)

AMAL KANTI NATH AND 3 ORS. v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 5 ORS.

WP(C)/2079/2020 · 2026-06-23

Manish Choudhury

Writ Petition (Civil)body2079

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010065972020 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/2079/2020 AMAL KANTI NATH AND 3 ORS. S/O- LATE SAHADEV NATH, R/O- RONGPUR PART- IV, P.O. AND P.S. SILCHAR, DIST.- CACHAR, ASSAM. 2: PARESH CHANDRA DAS S/O- LATE PROTISTO DAS R/O- SIMULTALA KARATIGRAM RONGPUR PART-III P.O. AND P.S. SILCHAR DIST.- CACHAR ASSAM. 3: DIPAK DAS S/O- SRI DEBENDRA CHANDRA DAS R/O- NABAPALLY KARATIGRAM RONGPUR PART-IV P.O. AND P.S. SILCHAR DIST.- CACHAR ASSAM. 4: AMALAVA DAS S/O- ATIN DAS R/O- NABAPOLLY (KARATIGRAM) RONGPUR PART-IV P.O. AND P.S. SILCHAR DIST.- CACHAR ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 5 ORS. REP. BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM, DISPUR, GUWAHATI- 781006. 2:THE ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Page No.# 2/3 DISPUR GUWAHATI- 781006. 3:THE DIRECTOR OF MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION ASSAM DISPUR GUWAHATI- 781022. 4:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER CACHAR P.O. SILCHAR DIST.- CACHAR ASSAM. 5:SILCHAR MUNICIPAL BOARD SILCHAR DIST.- CACHAR ASSAM PIN- 788001 REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN. 6:RONGPUR SOCIO-ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE RONGPUR PART-IV P.S. SILCHAR (SADAR) DIST.- CACHAR ASSAM PIN- 788809 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR S S DEY, MR. A BHATTACHARJEE,MR. D P BORAH,MR. M NATH Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY ORDER Date : 24-06-2026 Mr. A. Bhattacharjee, learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the subject-matter of the writ petition has become infructuous. Mr. N. Das, learned Junior Government Advocate, Assam for the Page No.# 3/3 respondent nos. 1 – 4 is present. In view of the above submission made by Mr. Bhattacharjee, learned counsel for the petitioners, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. The interim order passed earlier stands recalled. JUDGE Comparing Assistant