CRL.M.C. 2079/2026 Page 1 of 3 $~19 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 2079/2026 JAVED AHMAD & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Jaireer and Mr. Irshad, Advocate for Petitioners. versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Kiran Bairwa, APP for the State. SI Juli Goswami, P.S.: Jamia Nagar. Mr. Karnail Singh, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI O R D E R % 07.04.2026 CRL.M.A. 8582/2026 (exemption) Exemption granted, subject to just exceptions. Let requisite compliances be made within 01 week. The application stands disposed-of. CRL.M.C. 2079/2026 By way of the present petition filed under section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023, the petitioners seek quashing of case FIR No. 444/2024 dated 24.11.2024 registered under section 305 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (‘BNS’) at P.S.: Jamia Nagar, South-East Delhi. 2. It is noticed that petitioner No. 3 is about 17 years of age, however his name also has not been redacted. This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 27/04/2026 at 11:55:51 CRL.M.C. 2079/2026 Page 2 of 3 3. The Registry is directed to redact the name of petitioner No. 3 from the records. 4. The petition is premised on Memorandum of Understanding dated 08.01.2026, whereby the petitioners and respondent No. 2 have resolved the matter amicably. 5. The petition is also supported by affidavits of the petitioners and of respondent No. 2, alongwith proof of their IDs. 6. The contesting parties are present in court. Their credentials have been verified and they have also been identified by their respective counsel. 7. The court has interacted with the respondents, as also with the petitioners, who have confirmed that they have now resolved the matter and a Memorandum of Understanding dated 08.01.2026 has been signed by them closing all issues amicably. Parties now wish to live in peace and harmony going forward. 8. Ms. Kiran Bairwa, learned APP confirms that the State has no objection to the subject FIR being quashed. 9. In the circumstances, in line with the law laid down by the Supreme Court in Gian Singh vs. State of Punjab & Anr. reported as (2012) 10 SCC 303 as also in Narinder Singh & Ors. vs. State of Punjab & Anr. reported as (2014) 6 SCC 466, this court sees no reason why the subject FIR and all proceedings emanating therefrom should not be quashed. This court is of the view that in light of the settlement between the contesting parties, continuing with the subject FIR and all subsequent proceedings would be an exercise in futility and would not be conducive to peace and harmony between the parties. This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 27/04/2026 at 11:55:51 CRL.M.C. 2079/2026 Page 3 of 3 10. Accordingly, case FIR No. 444/2024 dated 24.11.2024 registered under section 305 of the BNS at P.S.: Jamia Nagar, South-East Delhi is quashed. All proceedings arising therefrom also stand closed. 11. Petition stands disposed-of. 12. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed-of. ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI, J APRIL 7, 2026/hb This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 27/04/2026 at 11:55:51