Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2077 DAILYLAW 2 (MAD)

The National Insurance Co Ltd v. M Kanagaraj

CMA/2077/2026 · 2026-07-08

N Anand Venkatesh

Transfer Petitionbody2077

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CMA No. 2077 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 6 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 08-07-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH CMA No. 2077 of 2026 AND CMP NO. 16013 OF 2026 The National Insurance Co Ltd No.930, Sathy Road, Gandhipuram, Coimbatore 641 012 ..Appellant(s) Vs 1. M Kanagaraj S/o Muniappan, No.2/5266, MSM Mani Nagar, Poondi Ring Road, Poolovapatti, Thiruppur 2. E Manikandan S/o Elumalai, No.142,Chengam, Kollukuttai, Pudupalayam, Devananthal, Tiruvannamalai, Polur 606 705. 3. R Arun S/o Ramamoorthy, No.4/18611, Sri Thangam Garden, Avinashilingampalayam, Palangarai, Tiruppur. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CMA No. 2077 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 6 ..Respondent(s) Prayer:- This Civil Miscellaneous petition filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles At to set aside the order passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal - Special Sub-court, Coimbatore in M.C.O.P. No. 1055 of 2024 and allow the appeal. For Appellant(s): Mr.S SENTHILKUMAR S.Remimol B.Srimathikamatchi Judgment This Civil Miscellaneous appeal has been filed by the Insurance Company challenging the award passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal/ Special Sub Court, Coimbatore in M.C.O.P No.1055 of 2024 dated 05.03.2026. 2. The first respondent is the claimant. The case of the first respondent is that on 30.12.2023 at about 8.35 hours., the first respondent was riding his two- wheeler on the Poondi to Poolovapatti ring road. At that point of time, the 2nd respondent, who was riding another two wheeler in a rash and negligent manner, dashed against the two-wheeler ridden by the first respondent, as a result of which the first respondent sustained grievous injuries and was admitted to the hospital for treatment. An FIR came to be registered in Crime No.992 of 2023. It is under these circumstances, the claim petition came to be filed before the tribunal. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CMA No. 2077 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 6 3. The Tribunal, on considering the facts and circumstances of the case and on appreciation of oral and documentary evidence, came to the conclusion that the accident had taken place due to the rash and negligent driving on the part of the driver of the offending vehicle. 4. Having rendered the above finding, the Tribunal proceeded to determine the compensation amount in the following manner: Sl.No. Compensation awarded under the head Amount (in Rs.) 1. Disability Rs.3,70,000/- 2. Pain and sufferings Rs.1,50,000/- 3. Extra Nourishment Rs. 25,000/- 4. Loss of Amenities Rs.50,000/- 5. Attender charges Rs.10,000/- 6. Transportation charges Rs.10,000/- 7. Damages to clothes Rs.5,000/- 8. Medical Expenses Rs.2,50,000/- 9. Loss of Income Rs.36,000/- Total Rs.9,06,000/- 5. The above compensation amount of Rs. 9,06,000/- was directed to be paid along with interest at the rate of 7.5% per annum from the date of the petition. However, considering the fact that the driver of the offending vehicle did not possess a valid driving license, pay and recover was ordered. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CMA No. 2077 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 6 5. The Insurance Company has filed the present appeal mainly on the ground that the driver of the offending vehicle did not possess a valid driving license and therefore, pay and recover ought not to have been ordered. 6. This Court carefully considered the submissions made by the learned counsel appearing for the appellant and also the award passed by the Tribunal. 7. The ground that was taken by the learned counsel appearing for the appellant is to the effect that the Tribunal ought not to have ordered for pay and recover. The said ground is squarely covered by the judgment of this Court in a batch of appeals in CMA.(MD).No.517 of 2025 etc, dated 01.06.2026. Hence, this Court does not find any illegality in the order passed by the Tribunal applying the principle of pay and recover. 8. Insofar as the quantum of compensation is concerned, this Court finds that the Tribunal has fixed a fair and just compensation and it does not require the interference of this Court. 9. In the result, this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal stands dismissed. The Insurance company is directed to deposit the entire compensation amount, less the amount already deposited, together with interest at 7.5% p.a. from the date of claim petition till the date of deposit within a period of six (4) weeks from the date of receipt of this judgment. The claimants will be entitled to withdraw the https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CMA No. 2077 of 2026 __________ Page5 of 6 compensation amount in the proportion as fixed by the Tribunal. The other directions issued by the Tribunal with regard to the mode of payment of compensation remains unaltered. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. 08-07-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No RKA To The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal - Special Sub-Court, Coimbatore https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CMA No. 2077 of 2026 __________ Page6 of 6 N.ANAND VENKATESH J. RKA CMA No. 2077 of 2026 AND CMP NO. 16013 OF 2026 08.07.2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis