Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2076 DAILYLAW 2 (PNJ)

RESHAM SINGH v. SMT.KANTA DEVI AND ORS

FAO/2076/1998 · 2026-04-30

Pankaj Jain

body2076

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[215] [1] Resham Singh Kanta Devi and others [2] Resham Singh Kartari and others [3] Resham Singh Inderjit Singh and others [4] Resham Singh Surjit and others [5] Resham Singh Satnam Kaur and others Coram : Present: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH FAO-2076 Date of Decision : Resham Singh versus Kanta Devi and others FAO-2081 Resham Singh versus Kartari and others FAO-2082 Resham Singh versus Inderjit Singh and others FAO-2083 Resham Singh versus Surjit and others FAO-2084 Resham Singh versus Satnam Kaur and others HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ JAIN None for the appellant(s). Mr. Pawan Kumar Goklaney, for respondent Nos.1, 2 & 4 in for respondent Nos.3 & 5 in FAO Mr. Vaibhav Sharma, Advocate for respondent No.4 in FAO- **** IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 2076-1998 (O&M) Date of Decision : 30.04.2026 …Appellant ….Respondents 2081-1998 (O&M) …Appellant ….Respondents 2082-1998 (O&M) …Appellant ….Respondents 2083-1998 (O&M) …Appellant ….Respondents 2084-1998 (O&M) …Appellant ….Respondents PANKAJ JAIN Mr. Pawan Kumar Goklaney, Advocate for respondent Nos.1, 2 & 4 in FAO-2076-1998 and FAO-2081-1998. Advocate -2084-1998. RAJNEESH SHARMA 2026.04.30 18:49 I agree to specified portions of this document FAO-2076-1998 (O&M) -2- and connected cases PANKAJ JAIN, J. (ORAL) [1] On the last date of hearing i.e. 23.03.2026, the following order was passed:- “The record of the appeals was lost in fire and has been reconstructed. Counsel through whom the appeals were preferred was elevated to Bench and now stands retired. Notice to the parties for 30.04.2026. A photocopy of this order be placed on the files of other connected cases.” [2] As per the office report, appellant No.1 has refused to accept notice. Appellant No.2 has died. [3] None appears on behalf of the appellants. [4] Dismissed for non prosecution. [5] Photocopy of this order be placed on the file of connected cases. (PANKAJ JAIN) JUDGE 30.04.2026 ‘R. Sharma' Whether speaking/ reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No RAJNEESH SHARMA 2026.04.30 18:49 I agree to specified portions of this document