GRAM SABHA MATHIYA GOSAI, TEHSIL-HARRIYA, THROUGH ITS VILLAGE RPADHAN RAM NARAYAN v. STATE OF UP AND 5 OTHERS
WPIL/2076/2025 · 2026-04-30
Arun Kumar
Public Interest Litigationbody2076
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2076 DAILYLAW 1 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2076 DAILYLAW 1 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 2076 of 2025 Court No. - 55 HON'BLE ARUN KUMAR, J.
1. Heard Sri P. K. Gupta, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State authorities and Sri Satya Prakash Singh, learned counsel for the private respondent nos4, 5 and 6.
2. The present petition has been filed seeking a direction to the State authorities to ensure removal of illegal encroachment made by private respondents over plot no.24 and 49 recorded as Chakmarg in the relevant revenue records relating to Village Mathiya Gosai, Tehsil Haraiya, District Basti.
3. Today, when the matter was taken up, learned counsel for the petitioner contends that pursuant to the order passed by this Court on 04.08.2025, demarcation of the plot in question was undertaken and the land recorded as Chakmarg was handed over to the Gram Sabha, pursuant to which, pathway has been restored. The said fact is also substantiated by the personal affidavit filed by the concerned Tehsildar.
4. In view of the aforesaid, as the relief claimed by the petitioner has been redressed, the present petition is disposed of as having become infructuous. May 1, 2026 Ashok Kr. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Pankaj Kumar Gupta Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Satya Prakash Singh (Arun Kumar,J.) Gram Sabha Mathiya Gosai, Tehsil-Harriya, Through Its Village Pradhan Ram Narayan .....Petitioner(s) State Of Up And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad