VARUN GOYAL S/O SHRI N.K. GOYAL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMP/2075/2020 · 2026-04-07
Anoop Kumar Dhand
body2075
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2075 DAILYLAW 1 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2075 DAILYLAW 1 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 2075/2020 Varun Goyal S/o Shri N.K. Goyal, R/o Basant Vihar Colony, Ajmer, Presently R/o 44, Shrinath Residential Scheme, in front of Sect.-1, Kudi Bhagtasani Housing Board Jodhpur. ----Petitioner Versus
1. State of Rajasthan, through PP
2. Anjali Goyal W/o Varun Goyal D/o Uttam Chand Bansal, R/o 14, DP Colony, Hem Marg, New Sanganer Road, Jaipur ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Ms.Kanika Dudi for Mr.Ram Manohar Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr.N.S. Dhakar, PP Mr.Mahesh Gupta JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND
Order 07/04/2026
1. By way of filing the instant criminal misc. petition, a challenge has been led to the impugned F.I.R. No.466/2017 registered at the Police Station Mahesh Nagar, District Jaipur City (South) for the offences punishable under Sections 498-A, 323, 406, 377, 506, 494 & 120B I.P.C. and a prayer has also been made to quash the aforesaid F.I.R.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has not committed any offence, still he has been falsely booked in the instant case hence, under these circumstances, interference of this Court is warranted.
(2 of 2) [CRLMP-2075/2020]
3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor as well as counsel appearing on behalf of the complainant opposed the aforesaid prayer and submit that after thorough investigation in the instant matter, Police has found prima facie case against the petitioner and submitted charge-sheet against him, hence, under these circumstances, interference of this Court is not warranted and the instant petition is liable to be rejected.
4. Heard and considered the submissions made at the Bar and perused the material available on record.
5. The allegations levelled in the impugned F.I.R. reveal commission of a cognizable offence and the correctness of allegations cannot be examined, adjudicated and adjudged by this Court, while exercising inherent jurisdiction contained under Section 482 Cr.P.C. Certainly, this task has been assigned to the Investigating Officer, who has already submitted charge-sheet against the petitioner before the concerned Court.
6. This Court deems it just and proper to dispose of the instant criminal misc. petition, granting liberty to the petitioner to take all available grounds as well as all the available defence, which have been taken before this Court before the Trial Court, at the appropriate stage of the trial.
7. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the instant petition stands disposed of. Stay application and all pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.
(ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Aayush Sharma/33