Page No.# 1/4 GAHC010151642026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./2069/2026 IMRAN HUSSAIN AND 3 ORS SON OF RAFIKUL ISLAM, RESIDENT OF BALIJAN, POLICE STATION- LALUK, DISTRICT- LAKHIMPUR, ASSAM 2: RIYAZ UDDIN SON OF RAFIQUL ISLAM RESIDENT OF BALIJAN POLICE STATION- LALUK DISTRICT- LAKHIMPUR ASSAM 3: RAJIBUL HAQUE SON OF ABDUL RAZAK RESIDENT OF BALIJAN POLICE STATION-LALUK DISTRICT- LAKHIMPUR ASSAM 4: MUKSIDUL ALOM SON OF ABDUL RAZAK RESIDENT OF BALIJAN POLICE STATION- LALUK DISTRICT- LAKHIMPUR ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. P HAZARIKA, MS. B THAKURIA,MR. P K MUNIR,MR. H S BORAH Page No.# 2/4 Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SHAMIMA JAHAN ORDER Date : 28.07.2026 Heard Mr. P. Hazarika, learned Counsel for the petitioners and Ms. S.H. Bora, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. 2. By this application, the petitioners have prayed for bail in connection with Laluk P.S. Case No. 132/2026 registered under Section 178/179/180/61(2)/111(2)(b) of the BNS, 2023. The FIR lodged in the instant case by the S.I. of Laluk Police Station reveals that on a reliable source information received by the police about involvement of the petitioners along with two others in a well organized fake Indian Currency Note racket, the police personnel conducted search operation in the residence of the said accused persons and during the search, Fake Currency Notes were recovered from the possession of one Abdul Razak and the other Motibur Rahman. However, it is stated in the said FIR that search was made even in the houses of other accused persons that is the petitioners but no counter fake currency notes were recovered and it is suspected that they must have concealed or removed the Fake Indian Currency Notes before arrival of the police party. Page No.# 3/4 3. The learned Counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners were arrested on 07.07.2026 and they have been inside the jail for 22 days. The learned Counsel has also placed the bail order in respect of other accused persons from whom, no recovery was made and as such bail was granted to them. However, in case of the petitioners, the learned Counsel has placed the rejection order, wherein it is stated that the case of the petitioners are different from that of the other accused persons as is revealed from the Case Diary. 4. Ms. S.H. Bora, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State, however, submits that the Case Diary would show the clear picture as to who were the accused persons involved in the said crime of distributing fake currency notes in the public. 5. Upon consideration of the submissions made by the parties, more so, due to the fact that the petitioners were already arrested and their statements were recorded by the police and interrogation was over and also that no recovery was made from their houses, this Court finds it fit to enlarge the petitioners on bail on furnishing of bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- each with one local surety each of the like amount to the satisfaction of CJM, Lakhimpur under the following conditions: i) the petitioners will appear before the Investigating Officer as and when call for. ii) the petitioners will not hamper, tamper with the evidence, neither influence the witnesses connected with the case. iii) the petitioners will not leave the place of jurisdiction without the Page No.# 4/4 permission of the said Court i.e. CJM, Lakhimpur. 6. Petition is disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant