COCP-2069 IN THE HI 110 1. Manjeet Sing Manjeet Sing 2. Gurwinder S Manjeet Sing CORAM: H Present: - NIDHI GUP 1. are being d consolidated total 11 pet 10146-2023 2026); where within a per the said orde 2069-2026 -1- E HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND H COCP-2069-2026 et Singh and others Versus et Singh Brar and others COCP-2111-2026 nder Singh and others Versus et Singh Brar and others Date o M: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDH Mr. PS Jammu and Mr. SK Yad for the petitioners (in both cases Mr. Manmeet Singh Teji, AAG, Mr. HS Randhawa, Advocate for respondent No. 4 (in COCP Mr. DS Randhawa, Advocate for respondents No. 3 and 4 (in I GUPTA, J. (ORAL) By this common order, 02 afore eing disposed of as both have been lidated order dated 25.08.2025 passed 1 petitions including that of the pe 2023 (COCP-2069-2026) and CW ; whereby the respondents were directe a period of 06 weeks from the date o id order. ND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH .… Petitioners .... Respondents .… Petitioners .... Respondents Date of Decision: 04.05.2026 NIDHI GUPTA K Yadav, Advocates h cases). AAG, Punjab. cate OCP-2069-2026). cate (in COCP-2111-2026). 2 aforementioned contempt petitions e been filed alleging violation of assed by the Writ Court in batch of the petitioners bearing Nos. CWP- CWP-19994-2022 (COCP-2111- directed to regularize the petitioners date of receipt of certified copy of ions of h of ners f RISHU KATARIA 2026.05.06 11:40 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. COCP-2069 2. behalf of re Randhawa, No. 3 and 4 of Appearan appropriate p 3. COCP-2069 10146-2023; District Pati others’ has 07.04.2026, contempt pe that in conn Council vs. filed, the Di directed tha thereto, the titled as ‘Ha was dismiss view of pen connected a Municipal C 21.04.2026 operation an 2069-2026 -2- Mr. HS Randhawa, Advocate of respondent No. 4 (in COCP-20 awa, Advocate has put in appearan and 4 (in COCP-2111-2026) and hav pearance(s), which are taken on record riate place in the respective files. At the very outset, learned cou 2069-2026) submits that in COCP-20 2023; LPA-634-2026 titled as ‘ t Patiala through its Executive Off has been filed by the respondents 2026, notice re:stay was also issued pt petition was filed by the petitioner connected appeal bearing LPA-85 vs. Harjit Singh and others’, as c Division Bench of this Court vide d that ‘contempt proceedings be k the connected contempt petition be Harjit Singh vs. Kulwant Singh D ismissed by a co-ordinate Bench vid of pendency of LPA-853-2026. It is a cted appeal bearing LPA-1095-2026, ipal Council, Nangal vs. Tilak Raj a 2026, the Division Bench of this C n and effect of the impugned judgme vocate has put in appearance on 2069-2026); whereas Mr. DS pearance on behalf of respondents d have filed their respective Memo record. Office to tag the same at the ed counsel for respondent No. 4 (in 2069-2026 arising out of CWP- as ‘Municipal Council Rajpura, e Officer vs. Manjeet Singh and ndents in which vide order dated issued, in view of the fact that no itioners, at that stage. It is submitted 853-2026, titled as ‘Municipal as contempt petitions have been vide order dated 08.04.2026 had be kept in abeyance’. Pursuant tion bearing No. COCP-1185-2026 ingh Director Local Govt., Punjab’ ch vide order dated 23.04.2026 in It is also pointed out that in other 2026, titled as ‘Executive Officer Raj and others’, vide order dated this Court had directed that ‘the gment shall remain stayed’. on DS ents emo t the (in ura, and ated t no itted ipal een had 026 in ther ficer ated he RISHU KATARIA 2026.05.06 11:40 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. COCP-2069 4. 08.04.2026 p 2026; and 21 on record. 5. 6. required to b 2069 and 21 7. 8. disposed of. 9. connected ca 04.05.2026 rishu 2069-2026 -3- Copies of orders dated 07.04.20 2026 passed in LPA-853-2026; dated 21.04.2026 in LPA-1095-2026, h Heard. In view of the facts noted ed to be passed in both the aforementio nd 2111-2026; and the same stand dis Rule stands discharged. Pending application(s) (in both ed of. A photocopy of this order be cted case. 2026 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable 7.04.2026 passed in LPA-634-2026; ; dated 23.04.2026 in COCP-1185- , handed over in Court are taken above, no further orders are mentioned petitions i.e. COCP Nos. dismissed. both cases), if any, shall also stand der be placed on the file of other ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE ned Yes/No Yes/No 026; ken are Nos. tand ther RISHU KATARIA 2026.05.06 11:40 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.