IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Sr. No.129 LPA-2061-2026 (O&M) Date of decision : 27.07.2026 Surinder Singh .…. Appellant Versus State of Punjab and others ..... Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL Present : Mr. Kamal Satija, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. Raghav Garg, AAG, Punjab. * * * * * DEEPAK SIBAL, J. (Oral) 1. Learned counsel for the appellant seeks to withdraw this appeal with liberty to avail alternate remedy under Section 76 of the Punjab State Election Commission Act, 1994, which permission has also been impliedly granted by the learned Single Judge in paragraph No.12 of the impugned judgment. 2. Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. 3. It is clarified that while granting the afore liberty, we have neither commented on the merits nor the maintainability/entertainability of the remedy that the appellant may avail. 4. If any remedy, in terms of the liberty granted through this order, is availed by the appellant, the same shall be decided by the competent authority within six months from the date of its filing, in accordance with law. 5. Pending miscellaneous applications also stand disposed of. [DEEPAK SIBAL] JUDGE 27.07.2026 [RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL] shamsher JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No SHAMSHER SINGH 2026.07.29 14:06 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Punjab and haryana high court, chandigarh