Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010393582025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] WEDNESDAY,THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2057/2025 Between:
1. MOPATI CHANDRASEKHAR REDDY, S/O. SUNDARA RAMI REDDY, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, R/O D.NO.6-5-165, PITCHIREDDYTHOPU, NAIDUPETA, TIRUPATI DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER AND
1. SRI K SRINIVASULLU, The Tahsildar, Chillakur Mandal Chillakur, Tirupati District.
...CONTEMNOR Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the respondent for not implementing the orders passed in WP No. 10105 of 2025 Dt 29-04- 2025under the provisions of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 for intentionally and willfully disobeyed the orders of this Hon'ble Court and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. SREE DEEPTHI G Counsel for the Contemnor:
1. MANNAM VENKATA KRISHNA RAO The Court made the following:
2
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2057/2025 ORDER:
This contempt case is filed against the respondent for willful disobedience of the orders dated 29.04.2025 passed by this Court in W.P.No.10105 of 2025.
2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondent.
3. Learned counsel for the respondent submits that order of this Court has been complied with.
4. On the last occasion learned counsel for the petitioner sought time for getting instructions. After instructions, learned counsel for the petitioner requested to grant liberty to challenge the speaking order passed by the respondent in compliance of the order of this Court.
5. In view of the compliance admitted by both the parties, no further orders are necessary.
6. Accordingly, the contempt case is closed. However, the petitioner is at liberty to challenge the speaking order issued by the respondent by initiating appropriate proceedings. No order as to costs. Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in the contempt case shall stand closed.
________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J 15.04.2026 TTPPSS
3
127 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
(closed)
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2057/2025
15.04.2026 TTPPSS