BAIL APPLN. 2047/2026 1 $~81 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + BAIL APPLN. 2047/2026 SH KHUSHVIR SINGH .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Manish Batra, Advocate. versus THE STATE NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Ms. Priyanka Dalal, APP with Insp. Manish Kumar and Insp. Rajender Singh. Mr. R K Singh, Advocate for complainant. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN O R D E R % 20.07.2026 1. Applicant seeks interim bail in case arising out of FIR No. 633/2023, registered at Police Station Narela, Delhi, for the commission of offences punishable under Sections 302/307/394/397/34 of IPC. 2. During course of consideration, it was informed that, in the interregnum, the mother of the applicant, who was in her nineties, had also expired. The bail is, however being sought, primarily, for the reason that the applicant is unwell and, in case, relief of interim bail is denied, there is a chance of him getting paralyzed. 3. The report has been furnished by prosecution, which indicates that the mother of the applicant i.e. Ms. Kuldeep Kaur, is very much alive and is staying at Samrala, Punjab. 4. Learned counsel for applicant submits that, on account of some incorrect instructions received by him from Pairokar, the abovesaid incorrect This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 22/07/2026 at 11:45:46 BAIL APPLN. 2047/2026 2 submission was made and feels apologetic for the same. 5. Report from the Jail Authorities has also been received which indicates that, though, the applicant is sick and bedridden but he is getting all the prescribed medicines and requisite diet from the Jail Dispensary. 6. During course of arguments, it was also informed by learned counsel for complainant, who has joined the proceedings through video conferencing, that one co-accused was, earlier, enlarged on interim bail but he has not surrendered and, therefore, proceedings under Section 82 Cr.P.C. have already been initiated against him. 7. Admittedly, on one previous occasion, learned Trial Court, itself, had given interim bail to the applicant for a period of two weeks to enable him to take appropriate treatment. Keeping in mind the overall facts and the gravity of the matter, this Court at this stage, at least, does not find any real requirement of enlarging the applicant on interim bail. 8. In view of the above, the application stands dismissed. 9. Needless to say, in case the medical condition of applicant deteriorates any further, he would be at liberty to file fresh application before learned Trial Court/Sessions Court. MANOJ JAIN, J JULY 20, 2026/sw/pb This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 22/07/2026 at 11:45:46