Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK CRLMC No.2045 of 2026 Tulasi Harijan …. Petitioner(s) Ms. Sasmita Nanda, Adv. -versus- State of Odisha & Anr. …. Opposite Party(s) Mr. Tej Kumar, ASC Ms. Kaberi Mohanty Adv. (for O.P. No.2)
CORAM:
HON’BLE DR.JUSTICE SANJEEB K PANIGRAHI
Order No.
01.
ORDER 03.07.2026
1. This matter is taken up through hybrid arrangement.
2. By filing the present CRLMC, the Petitioner has prayed for quashing of the F.I.R. registered in Nabarangpur P.S. Case No.152 of 2018, corresponding to G.R. Case No.496 of 2018, pending in the Court of the learned Civil Judge-cum-A.S.J. (Women’s Court, Nabarangpur, along with the entire criminal proceeding arising therefrom against Opposite Party No.2.
3. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned Additional Standing Counsel for the State.
4.
Learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that the present CRLMC arises out of a matrimonial dispute Digitally Signed Signed by: SIPUN BEHERA Reason: Authentication Location: HIGH COURT OF ORISSA, CUTTACK Date: 03-Jul-2026 18:38:45 Signature Not Verified
between the Petitioner and Opposite Party No.2. During pendency of the criminal proceeding, the parties were referred to the Mediation Centre, Nabarangpur, where they amicably resolved all their disputes. In support of such settlement, learned counsel has placed on record the compromise petition dated 02.05.2026, annexed as Annexure-3 to the present petition.
5. It is further submitted that the Petitioner (informant) and Opposite Party No.2, being wife and husband, have resumed their matrimonial relationship pursuant to the settlement and are presently residing together under one roof and leading a peaceful conjugal life. In view of the settlement, neither party intends to pursue the criminal proceeding.
6.
Learned counsel for the Petitioner further submits that the Petitioner has voluntarily approached this Court seeking quashing of the F.I.R. and the consequential criminal proceeding without any coercion, undue influence or pressure, as the disputes have been amicably settled before the Mediation Centre, Nabarangpur. Hence, she prayed that the F.I.R. and the entire criminal proceeding be quashed in exercise of the inherent jurisdiction of this Court under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. Digitally Signed Signed by: SIPUN BEHERA Reason: Authentication Location: HIGH COURT OF ORISSA, CUTTACK Date: 03-Jul-2026 18:38:45 Signature Not Verified
7. Learned Additional Standing Counsel for the State submits that in view of the compromise arrived at between the parties and considering the nature of the dispute, the State has no serious objection if the criminal proceeding is quashed.
8. Considering the submissions advanced by the
learned counsel for the parties and upon perusal of the compromise petition dated 02.05.2026, it appears that the dispute between the parties is purely matrimonial in nature and has been amicably resolved through mediation. The parties have resumed cohabitation and are presently living together as husband and wife. Continuation of the criminal proceeding, in such circumstances, would serve no useful purpose and is likely to disturb the restored matrimonial harmony.
9. In the facts of the present case, the dispute being matrimonial in nature, the settlement having been voluntarily arrived at before the Mediation Centre and the parties having resumed their matrimonial life, this Court is satisfied that continuation of the criminal proceeding would be an abuse of the process of law and that quashing of the proceeding would secure the ends of justice.
10. Accordingly, the CRLMC stands allowed.
11. The F.I.R. registered in Nabarangpur P.S. Case No.152 of 2018, corresponding to G.R. Case No.496 of 2018, Digitally Signed Signed by: SIPUN BEHERA Reason: Authentication Location: HIGH COURT OF ORISSA, CUTTACK Date: 03-Jul-2026 18:38:45 Signature Not Verified
pending before the learned Civil Judge-cum-A.S.J. (Women’s Court, Nabarangpur, along with all consequential criminal proceedings arising therefrom against Opposite Party No.2 (Jagadish Harijan @ Raja), is hereby quashed.
12. Pending application (s), if any, shall stand disposed of.
13. Issue urgent certified copy of this order as per Rules.
(Dr. Sanjeeb K Panigrahi) Judge
Sipun ORISSA, CUTTACK