Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2044 DAILYLAW 1 (AP)

V. Venkatesh, v. Jayalakshmi

CC/2044/2026 · 2026-06-17

Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao

Contempt Petitionbody2044

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010215412026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] THURSDAY,THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2044/2026 Between: 1. V. VENKATESH,, S/O V.MEKALAPPA, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, OCC CULTIVATION, R/O H.NO.3-31, ANGANAMALA KOTHUR VILLAGE, POGUMPALLI, GUDUPALLI MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, A.P., PIN. 517426. ...PETITIONER AND 1. JAYALAKSHMI, The Revenue Divisional Officer, O/o The Revenue Divisional Officer, Kuppam Mandal, Chittoor District, A.P.,Pin. 517426. ...CONTEMNOR Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the respondents herein for willfully and deliberately disobeying the orders of this Honble High Court dated 18.09.2025 in W.P. No. 25154 of 2025 under Article 215 of Constitution of India read with Sections 10 to 12 of The Contempt of Courts Act and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant leave to the petitioner to file and prosecute the Contempt Petition i.e., C.C.No. of 2026 against the respondent No.2/contemnor No.2, is included due to his contemptuous conduct under Sections 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, for his willful disobedience of the order in W.P.No.25154 of 2025 dated 18-09-2026 and pass. 2 Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. TRIMOORTHY K G Counsel for the Contemnor: 1. The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO CONTEMPT CASE No.2044 of 2026 ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the order of this Court has been complied with by the respondent. 2. Recording the said submission, the present Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, interlocutory applications, pending in the contempt case shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date: 18.06.2026 KBN 4 29 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Contempt Case No.2044 of 2026 18.06.2026 KKBBNN