Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2042 DAILYLAW 1 (HP)

CHANDNI PANDEY AND ORS v. RAM KISHAN AND ANR

CMP.M/2042/2025 · 2026-07-02

Sushil Kukreja

body2042

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Chandni Pandey & Ors. Vs. Ram Kishan & Anr. CMP(M) No. 2042/2025 02.07.2026 Present: Ms. Pallavi, Advocate, vice Mr. Ashwani Kaundal, Advocate, for the appellants. Ms. Nandita, Advocate, for respondent No. 1. Respondent No. 2 ex parte. CMP(M) No. 2042/2025 Heard. Having regard to the averments made in the application, which is duly supported by an affidavit of the applicant, this Court finds sufficient cause to condone the delay of 33 days’ that has occurred in filing the present appeal. Consequently, the application is allowed and delay of 33 days’ that has occurred in filing the present appeal is condoned. The application stands disposed of. FAO (MV) No. /2026 Appeal be registered. Heard. Admit. Ms. Nandita, Advocate, accepts service of post admission notice on behalf of respondent No. 1. Let post admission notice be issued to respondent No. 2 returnable within four weeks, on taking steps within two days. List thereafter. In the meantime, let records of learned Tribunal below be also called for. ( Sushil Kukreja ) Judge 2nd July, 2026 (raman)