Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2037 DAILYLAW 2 (UTT)

KAMAL KUMAR RAWAT v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPCRL/2037/2019 · 2026-07-28

Alok Mahra

body2037

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS UKHC010186942019 WPCRL/2037/2019 Kamal Kumar Rawat --Petitioner Versus State Of Uttarakhand --Respondent Alongwith WPCRL/1540/2019 Harish Chandra Tiwari --Petitioner Versus State Of Uttarakhand --Respondent Hon’ble Alok Mahra, J. None is present for the petitioners. 2. Mr. Dinesh Chauhan, A.G.A. for the State. 3. Mr. K.K. Tiwari, Advocate for the private respondent/complainant. 4. Learned counsel for the complaint submits that both the cases have been compounded and have rendered infructuous. 5. Since, the matters have been compounded, both the writ petitions stand disposed of, as having been rendered infructuous. (Alok Mahra J.) 28.07.2026 Ujjwal