IN TH 106 Rajesh Ku Anand Mo Forest Dep 17, Chand CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GU CM-4077 rejoinder o No.2. and the rejo COCP-203 violation o ordinate B Kumar and petition wa COCP-2037-2025 (O & M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA AT CHANDIGAR COCP No.2037 o Date of decision sh Kumar and another Versus nd Mohan Sharan, Addl. Chief Secr st Department, Haryana, Civil Sec handigarh and others AM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NI Mr. Madan Pal, Advocate for the applicants-petitioners Mr. Naveen Kumar, Addl. A.G HI GUPTA J. (Oral) 4077-CII-2026 Prayer in this application is nder on behalf of petitioners to the The application is allowed s he rejoinder is taken on record. 2037-2025 Present contempt petition tion of order dated 27.5.2024 (Anne ate Bench of this Court in CWP-126 ar and another vs. State of Haryana ion was disposed of on the basis of s 1 UNJAB AND HARYANA IGARH 2037 of 2025 (O & M) cision :-19.03.2026 …..Petitioners Secretary/Principal Secretary, il Secretariat, Haryana, Sector …..Respondents E NIDHI GUPTA s. dl. A.G., Haryana. ion is for placing on record the to the reply filed by respondent ed subject to all just exceptions ition has been filed alleging (Annexure P-1) passed by a co- 12634-2024 titled as “Rajesh aryana and others”, whereby the is of statement made by learned VIJAY ASIJA 2026.03.20 16.04 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document counsel fo petitioners point of ti petitioners claim will order will receipt of a relief to th due reason mentioned the petitio keeping in respondent not pressed respondent in pursuan submitted, (Annexure Computer Kaithal For 31.03.2025 terminated 30.06.2022 and conseq COCP-2037-2025 (O & M) sel for the respondents to the eff ners feels that the posts against whi of time still exists, in case, any su ners by way of filing an appropria will be decided in accordance wit will be passed within a period of t of any such claim and in case, it is o the petitioners, the same will be e asons for not accepting the claim ned in the speaking order so passed titioners. Learned counsel for the g in view the statement made by dents, present petition may kindly b essed any further with liberty to the dents by way of filing an appropriat It is submitted by learned coun ursuance of the aforesaid order, a itted, which came to be accepted vi exure P-34), and the petitioners were puter Data Entry Operator for the s al Forest Division. However, shortly 3.2025 (Annexure P-35), the service inated on the ground that upon re 6.2022, the petitioners did not fulfill onsequently, the earlier order dated 12 2 he effect that “…in case, the which they worked at one given y such claim is raised by the priate representation, the said with law and an appropriate of 08 weeks from the date of it is found feasible to grant the be extended to them otherwise, laim of the petitioners will be ssed, which will be conveyed to r the petitioners submits that e by learned counsel for the dly be disposed of having been the petitioners to approach the riate representation…” d counsel for the petitioners that, der, a representation was duly ted vide order dated 12.03.2025 were taken back into service as a the smooth functioning of the hortly thereafter, vide order dated services of the petitioners were on review of the policy dated fulfill the prescribed conditions, ated 12.03.2025 (Annexure P-34) VIJAY ASIJA 2026.03.20 16.04 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document was withdr directions i State subm and the req not perman that as pe engagemen be made on is, howeve through th considered attention to issued by t petitioner Forests, K Rozgar Nig the directio the claim o order. Adm considered grievance, COCP-2037-2025 (O & M) withdrawn. It is contended that such tions issued by the Writ Court. Per contra, learned counsel a submits that the petitioners were en the requirements for the post of Comp ermanent and varies from time to ti as per the prevailing Policy (An gements cannot be made through outs ade only through Haryana Kaushal R owever, fairly stated that the petition gh the said mode and, if found el idered in accordance with law. At this stage, learned counse tion to the communication dated 18. d by the Forest Department, Haryana ioners has been recommended and t sts, Kaithal has directed that the p ar Nigam Ltd. be opened to accommo Heard learned counsel for the p In view of the facts noticed a irection issued by the Writ Court was laim of the petitioners and passing o r. Admittedly, the representation of idered and appropriate orders have be ance, if any, arising out of withd 3 t such action is contrary to the nsel appearing on behalf of the engaged on contractual basis Computer Data Entry Operator is e to time. It is further submitted (Annexure P-36), contractual h outsourcing and are required to shal Rozgar Nigam Ltd. portal. It etitioners are at liberty to apply nd eligible, their case shall be ounsel for the petitioners draws ed 18.12.2025 (Annexure P-38), aryana, whereby the case of the and the Deputy Conservator of the portal of Haryana Kaushal ommodate the petitioners. or the parties. ticed above, this Court finds that rt was limited for consideration of sing of a reasoned and speaking on of the petitioners has been ave been passed. The subsequent withdrawal of the benefit or VIJAY ASIJA 2026.03.20 16.04 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document termination which cann order passe of. March 19 Vijay Asija Whether spea Whether Repo COCP-2037-2025 (O & M) ination of services, would give rise t h cannot be adjudicated in the present Accordingly, no case for w r passed by the Writ Court is made out Consequently, the present cont Rule stands discharged. Pending application(s), if any 9, 2026 r speaking/reasoned Yes / No r Reportable Yes / No 4 rise to a fresh cause of action, resent contempt proceedings. for willful disobedience of the de out. nt contempt petition is dismissed. if any, shall also stand disposed ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2026.03.20 16.04 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document