Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2036 DAILYLAW 1 (HP)

VIJAY KUMAR JUNEJA v. STATE OF HP

CRMP/2036/2026 · 2026-05-21

Sushil Kukreja

body2036

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Vijay Kumar Juneja Vs. State of H.P. Cr. MPs No. 2036/2026 & 2052/2026 in Cr. MP(M) 321/2026 21.05.2026 Present: Mr. Ajay Kochhar, Senior Advocate with Mr. Anubhav Chopra, Advocate, for the applicant/petitioner. Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General, for the respondent/State. The present applications under Section 528 of BNSS have been filed by the applicant seeking extension of order dated 22.04.2026, passed by this Court, whereby, interim bail for a period of four weeks’ has been granted to the applicant till today, i.e. 21.05.2026 and for placing on record the copy of medical records. 2. It has been averred in the application (Cr. MP No. 2036 of 2026) that during the course of treatment of the applicant at PGIMER, Chandigarh, he has undergone various checkups and tests and during check-up, it has been diagnosed that a space/gap is created in the lower vertebral column of the applicant and he has been advised to undergo physiotherapy sessions at PGI, Chandigarh starting from 25.05.2026. It has further been averred in the application that the applicant is suffering from high blood sugar and high cholesterol and he is on constant medication for the same, as the sugar and cholesterol levels of the applicant have exceeded above the normal level. It has also been averred in the application that the applicant is also suffering from cardiological ailments and he has been advised to undergo Angiography and has been advised to be admitted in the Critical Care Unit (CCU) at PGI, Chandigarh. It has further been averred in the application (Cr. MP No. 2052 of 2026) that the applicant has been admitted at PGIMER, Chandigarh on 19.05.2026 to undergo Angiography, as he is suffering from cardiological ailment. To substantiate the aforesaid averments, the applicant has also appended medical records as well as admission slip pertaining to his treatment alongwith the applications as Annexure A-1 & Annexure A-2. 3. Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, learned Additional Advocate General, on instructions received, has not disputed the factum of the ailment as well as factum of admission of the applicant at PGIMER, Chandigarh. 4. I have heard the learned Senior Counsel for the applicant, learned Additional Advocate General and also gone through the records of the case. 5. In view of the ailments being suffered by the applicant and also in view of the fact that the applicant has been admitted in PGIMER, Chandigarh, medical records whereof have been appended with the applications as Annexure A-1 & Annexure A-2, the present applications are allowed and interim bail granted to the applicant vide order dated 22.04.2026, is further extended for a period of four weeks, i.e. till 21.06.2026 on same terms and conditions and after expiry of four weeks, i.e. on 22.06.2026, the police escort will bring him back to District Jail, Kaithu, Shimla, H.P., as per jail manual. The applications are disposed of. ( Sushil Kukreja ) Judge 21st May, 2026 (raman) RAMAN THAKUR Digitally signed by RAMAN THAKUR Date: 2026.05.21 15:03:58 +0530