IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2033 of 2025 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.14435 of 2024 ====================================================== Sanjeev Kumar Singh Son of Bimal Kumar Singh Resident of Village- Chandadih, PS.-Dhoraiya, District-Banka. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar through Mr. Navneer Shukla the Collector, Banka. 2. Mr. Navneer Shukla, the Collector, Banka. 3. Mrs. Bandana Verma, L.R.D.C., Banka. 4. Mr. Shreenivash Kumar Singh, the Circle Officer, Dhoraiya, Banka. 5. Mr. Bijoy Kumar Singh Son of Late Nirmal Prasad Singh Resident of Village-Chandadih, Police Station- Dhoraiya, District- Banka. 6. Bipin Kumar Singh Son of Late Nirmal Prasad Singh Resident of Village- Chandadih, Police Station- Dhoraiya, District- Banka. 7. Bablu Kumar Singh Son of Late Nirmal Prasad Singh Resident of Village- Chandadih, Police Station- Dhoraiya, District- Banka. 8. Anil Kumar Singh @ Sunil Kumar Singh Son of Late Rajendra Singh Resident of Village-Chandadih, Police Station- Dhoraiya, District- Banka. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajib Ranjan Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Shiv Kumar, AC to GA-3 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 4 18-03-2026 Heard the parties. 2. The present petition has been preferred for the following relief/s: “1. That this application for initiation of contempt proceeding and for punishment against the contemnor/opposite party No. 4 for his willful disobedience of the order Patna High Court MJC No.2033 of 2025(4) dt.18-03-2026 2/2 dated 23.09.024 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 14435/2024 later on the said order was modified in M.J.C. No. 3763/2024 passed by Hon'ble Mr. Justice RudraPrakash Mishra vide order dated 19.03.2025 with regard to the place where theopposite party No. 4 was posted and the name of father of Opposite Parties No. 5 to 7.” 3. A show-cause has been filed on behalf of the opposite parties. Learned counsel for the State, referring to paragraph no. 5 of the show-cause submits that the order of this Court has been complied. 4. Considering the aforesaid, it appears that opposite parties have complied the order of this Court. 5. In view of the above, the contempt application stands disposed of. Alok Verma/- (Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) U