UDAY YADAV ALIAS UADAY YADAV v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
A.B.A./2015/2026 · 2026-05-04
Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 9997 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 9997 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:JHHC:13203
--1-- A.B.A. No. 2015 of 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI
A.B.A. No. 2015 of 2026
----
1. Uday Yadav @ Uaday Yadav, aged about 21 years, son of Badri Yadav, resident of village – Gobindpur, Panchayat Hiranandanpur, PO and PS – Pakur, District – Pakur, Jharkhand
2. Probin Mandal @ Parveen Mandal, aged about 36 years, son of Amar Mandal, resident of village – Mahuadanga, Panchayat – Hiranandnpur, PO and PS – Pakur, District – Pakur, Jharkhand
3. Gourab Das @ Gourab Kumar, aged about 27 years, son of Bablu Das, resident of Ward No.3, village – Mahuadanga, Panchayat – Hiranandanpur, PO and PS – Pakur, District – Pakur, Jharkhand
4. Nanda Kishore Shah @ Kishor Kumar, aged about 38 years, son of Ram Piya Shah, resident of Ward No.3, village – Mahuadanga, Panchayat – Hiranandanpur, PO and PS – Pakur, District – Pakur, Jharkhand
.... Petitioners -- Versus --
The State of Jharkhand
.... Opposite Party
----
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
---
For the Petitioners :- Mr. Sumit Gautam, Advocate
:- Mr. Anjani Kumar, Advocate
:- Mr. Pramendra Kr. Mehta, Advocate
For the State
:- Mrs. Ruby Pandey, Advocate
---- 02/04.05.2026 Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioners as well as the learned counsel appearing for the State.
2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Pakur (Town) P.S. Case No. 16 of 2026, registered for the offence under Sections 189(2), 189(3), 189(4), 189(5), 190, 191(2), 191(3), 221, 222, 132, 285, 126(2), 326(g), 324(3), 324(5), 62 and 109(1) of
2026:JHHC:13203
--2-- A.B.A. No. 2015 of 2026
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, pending in the court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Pakur.
3.
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that in a road accident, one person has died, pursuant to that 500-600 persons were agitating and there are general and omnibus allegations against all the accused persons of blocking the road. He next submits that in the similar circumstances, the other co-accused persons have already been granted anticipatory bail in A.B.A. Nos. 1217, 1222, 1353, 1382, 1654 and 1392 of 2026.
4.
Learned counsel appearing for the State has opposed the prayer and submits that the allegations are there of blocking the road.
5. Considering that 500-600 persons were agitating pursuant to a road accident, in which, one person has died and further there are general and omnibus allegations against all the accused persons and also in the similar circumstance, the other co-accused persons have already been granted anticipatory bail in the aforementioned A.B.As., in that view of the matter, the petitioners, named above, are directed to surrender before the learned Court within two weeks from today and the learned Court shall release the petitioners on such terms and conditions or the sureties as the learned Court may deem fit and proper.
(Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated 04.05.2026 Sangam/