Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9996 (CHH)

SANTURAM KAMAR v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

MCRC/3403/2026 · 2026-04-28

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:19882 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCRC No. 3403 of 2026 1. Santuram Kamar S/o Shri Jagnnath Kamar. Aged About 35 Years R/o Vill-Khallari, P.S. -Khallari, Tehsil-Bagbahara, Distt. Mahasamund (C.G.) 2. Ramcharn Kamar, S/o Shri Sunder Kamar, Aged About 28 Years R/o Vill-Khallari, P.S. -Khallari, Tehsil-Bagbahara, Distt. Mahasamund (C.G.) ... Applicants versus State Of Chhattisgarh Through Khallari Distt.-Mahasamund (C.G.) ... Non-Applicant For Applicants : Mr. Anway Tiwari, Advocate. For Non-Applicant/State : Ms. Smriti Shrivastava, Panel Lawyer. Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice Order on Board 29.04.2026 1. The applicants have preferred this First Bail Application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short ‘BNSS’), for grant of regular bail, as they have been arrested in connection with Crime No. 12/2026, registered at Police Station Khallari, District - Mahasamund (C.G.) for the offence punishable under Section 34(2) of Chhattisgarh Excise Act. 2. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that he does not wish PREETI KUMARI Digitally signed by PREETI KUMARI Date: 2026.04.30 13:36:01 +0530 2 to press the present bail application, as the applicants have already been granted bail by this Court on 24.03.2026 passed in MCRC No. 1733/2026. He further states that the deponent, namely Sundar Kamar, has filed an affidavit in compliance with the notice issued to him by this Court vide order dated 15.04.2026. 3. In view of the submission made by learned counsel for the applicants, the instant bail application is dismissed as withdrawn with caution to the applicants that they shall not repeat such act in future. Sd/- (Ramesh Sinha) Chief Justice Preeti