Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9996 (ALL)

FOOLA YADAV v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

NABAIL/10298/2026 · 2026-09-30

Rajiv Lochan Shukla

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 10298 of 2026 Court No. - 71 HON'BLE RAJIV LOCHAN SHUKLA, J. 1. At the very outset, the Learned A.G.A. has raised an objection that the offences alleged against the applicant is not punishable with imprisonment exceeding seven years. It is further submitted that the chargesheet has been filed and there is no apprehension of arrest of the applicant, therefore, the present application seeking anticipatory bail is not maintainable. 2. After some arguments, Learned counsel for the applicant prays that the applicant may be permitted to approach the concerned Court and apply for regular bail, which may be directed to be decided in accordance with the law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation & Another, (2021) 10 SCC 773. He further prays that for a short time, the interest of the applicant may be protected. 3. The Learned A.G.A. has no objection to the said prayer. 4. Taking into account the submissions made by the Learned counsel for the parties, it is directed that in case the applicant appears in Case Crime No.230 of 2020, under Sections 147, 148, 149, 308, 323, 325, 504 & 506 I.P.C., Police Station Phoolpur, District Azamgarh, before the Court concerned within a period of four weeks from today and applies for bail, her bail application shall be considered and disposed of expeditiously in accordance with law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Amrendra Nath Rai, Sanjay Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Foola Yadav .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation & Another, (2021) 10 SCC 773, and also subsequent orders of the Supreme Court in the aforementioned case, without being influenced by any observations made by the concerned Court while rejecting the anticipatory bail application of the applicant. 5. For a period of four weeks from today, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicant in the aforesaid case. 6. With the aforesaid observations/directions, this application stands disposed of. October 1, 2026 A. Pandey NABAIL No. 10298 of 2026 2 (Rajiv Lochan Shukla,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANAND PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad