APHC010224892011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3333] MONDAY, THE 7th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA WRIT PETITION NO: 6237/2011 Between: 1. R. MUNIYANDI, S/O. P. RAMASWAMY BUSNINESS R/O. NO. 5/18, ORI SALAI J.J. NAGAR (EAST) MUGAPPAIR (EAST) ...PETITIONER AND 1. TIRUMALA TIRUPATI DEVASTHANAMS, TIRUPATHI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, REP BY ITS EXECUTIVE OFFICER 2. TIRUMALA TIRUPATI DEVASTHANAMS, TIRUMALA, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, REP BY ITS DEPUTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER (TEMPLE) 3. GOVERNMENT OF A P REP BY ITS D G VE EX OFFICIO, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, VIGILANCE & ENFORCEMENT DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toIssue any appropriate writ, order or direction preferably a writ in the nature of Certiorari calling for the records relating to the proceedings in Roc No. P3/48/AEO/(ARJ)/TML/2011 dt. 19.2.2011 isued by the respondents and to quash the same as being illegal, arbitrary, contrary to principles of natural justice, violative of Sec. 142 of the A.P. Charitable & Hindu Religious and Endowments Act, 1987 and also violative of Art. 14 and 25 to 27 of the Constitution of India, and consequently direct the respondents to permit the petitioner to attend the Sevas on the basis of the tickest booked by the petitioner, in advance on the dates mentioned in the statement drawn by the 2 respondents in their proceedings in Roc No. P3/48/AEO/(ARJ)/TML/2011 dt. 19.2.2011 and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2011(WPMP 7773 OF 2011 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased suspend the operation of the proceedings in Roc No. P3/48/AEO/(ARJ)/TML/2011 dt. 19.2.2011 isued by the respondents, by directing the respondents to permit the petitioner to attend the Sevas, on the days mentioned in the statement drawn by the respondnts in their proceedings in Roc No. P3/48/AEO/(ARJ)/TML/2011 dt. 2.2.2011, pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. M KARUNA SAGAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2. C SRINIVASA BABA 3. Y V RAVI PRASAD The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA WRIT PETITION NO: 6237/2011 ORDER: Aggrieved by the proceedings in Roc No.P3/48/AEO(ARJ)/TML/2011, dated 19.02.2011 issued by the Executive Officer, Tirumala Tirupati Devasthanams cancelling the bulk booking of Arjitha Seva tickets, the present writ petition has been filed. 2. The case of the petitioner, in brief, is that he had purchased tickets in advance for sevas, namely Archana and Tomala Seva for the period from January 2011 to October, 2017. 3. In view of the lapse of considerable time, this Court is of the opinion that no cause survives for adjudication in the present writ petition. As such, the writ petition has become infructuous. 4. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall also stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE V.SUJATHA Date: 07.09.2026 KA 4 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA WRIT PETITION NO: 6237/2011 Date: 07.09.2026 KA