Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9990 (BOM)

MARUTI DATTOBA NIMANKAR v. DIGAMBAR SHANKARRAO NIMANKAR AND ORS.

CRA/108/2026 · 2026-09-21

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1/2 16-CRA-108-2026(C).DOC IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.108 OF 2026 Maruti Dattoba Nimankar ….Applicant VERSUS Digambar Shankarrao Nimankar and Ors. ....Respondents _________________________________________________________________ Mr. Sairaj Suryavanshi i/b Mr. Ishaan Kapse, for Applicant. _________________________________________________________________ CORAM : ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J. DATE : 21st SEPTEMBER, 2026. P.C. 1. Heard Mr. Sairaj Suryavanshi, learned Advocate for the Applicant. 2. By the present Application, the Applicant has sought the following substantial relief: “B. After quashing and setting aside the order dated 25.11.2025 passed by Ld. Civil Judge, Junior Division, Ichalkaranji below Exhibit 141 in RCS No.263 of 2005 this Hon’ble Court be pleased to allow application preferred below Exhibit 141 in RCS No.263 of 2005.” Shantanu S. Dhudum SHANTANU SHANKARSA DHUDUM Digitally signed by SHANTANU SHANKARSA DHUDUM Date: 2026.09.22 12:47:28 +0530 2/2 16-CRA-108-2026(C).DOC 3. Mr. Sairaj Suryavanshi, learned Advocate for the Applicant, on instructions from the Applicant, seeks leave to withdraw the present Application. 4. In view of the statement made by Mr. Sairaj Suryavanshi, learned Advocate for the Applicant, leave is granted to withdraw the present Application. 5. Civil Revision Application No.108 of 2026 is disposed of as withdrawn. ( ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.) Shantanu S. Dhudum