D.KHADER VALI SAHEB v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
WP/7904/2026 · 2026-04-08
Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 999 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 999 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010144412026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3328] THURSDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 7904/2026 Between:
1. D.KHADER VALI SAHEB, S/O D.SULTHAN SAHEB, AGED 48 YEARS, OCC CONTRACTOR, DR.NO.3/887, SANTHI NAGAR, DHARMAVARAM, SRI SATYA SAI DISTRICT
(FORMERLY ANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT) ANDHRA PRADESH-515671. ...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, MUNCIPAL ADMINISTRATION AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI. 522237
2. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI. 522237. 3. THE DHARMAVARAM MUNICIPALITY, REP BY ITS COMMISSIONER, DHARMAVARAM, SRI SATYA SAI DISTRICT
(FORMERLY ANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT) 515671. 4. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, DHARMAVARAM MUNICIPALITY, SRI SATYA SAI DISTRICT. 515671 (FORMERLY ANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT)
5. THE DY EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, DHARMAVARAM MUNICIPALITY, SRI SATYA SAI DISTRICT, 515671. (FORMERLY ANANTHAPURAM
2
DISTRICT)
...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. DASARI S V V S V PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV AP
2. GP FOR FINANCE PLANNING The Court made the following:
ORAL ORDER:
Heard Ms. Kondisetty Sri Lakshmi, learned Counsel representing Sri Dasari S.V.V.S.V Prasad, learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioner and Sri G. Lakshmi Narayana, learned Standing Counsel for Municipalities. 2. Sri G. Lakshmi Narayana, learned Standing Counsel for Municipalities, has submitted the Written Instructions furnished by the Commissioner of Dharmavaram Municipality, dated 08.04.2026 along with certain documents. Copies of it are supplied to the Counsel for the Writ Petitioner and the same are taken on record. 3. Para 4 of the Written Instructions admits that the claim made by the Writ Petitioner is to an extent of Rs.1,42,677/- (Gross Amount). 4. Having regard to the facts that, admittedly, the Writ Petitioner had completed execution of the work during the years 2016–17, the Municipality has withheld a sum of Rs. 1,42,677/-. 5.
Having regard to this fact, this Court deems it appropriate to allow this Writ Petition with a direction to all the Respondents, including Respondent Nos.2 & 3, to complete the entire Administrative process, both inter- departmental and intra-departmental, by way of mutual co-operation and coordination, within a period of one (01) week from the date of uploading of
3
the Order on the website of this Court, and to transfer the amount to the bank account of the Writ Petitioner within one (01) week thereafter. Since the amount has been withheld for a long time, any delay on the part of the Respondents will be viewed seriously by this Court. 6. The Writ Petitioner is directed to submit the bank account details to the Competent Authority within one (01) week from today for effective compliance. 7. With these observations and directions, the Writ Petition is allowed. No
order as to costs.
8. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order.
_________________________________ GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Dt: 09.04.2026 DSV
4
214
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD
WRIT PETITION NO: 7904/2026
09.04.2026
DSV
5
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATHI MAIN CASE No. WRIT PETITION NO: 7904/2026 PROCEEDING SHEET
Sl. No
DATE
ORDER Office Note
01.
09.04.2026 GRKP, J
Writ Petition is allowed. (vide separate order)
___________
GRKP, J DSV
6