Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9988 (BOM)

SHAHNA PRALHAD ADVANI v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

WP/3305/2025 · 2026-09-21

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

MANOJ 9-WP-3305-2025.DOC IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.3305 OF 2025 Ms. Shahna Prahlad Advani …Petitioner V/s. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. …Respondents WITH INTERIM APPLICATION (ST) NO.3486 OF 2025 IN WRIT PETITION NO.3305 OF 2025 Mr. Prahlad Sunder Advani IN THE MATTER BETWEEN:- Ms. Shahna Prahlad Advani …Intervenor …Applicant V/s. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. …Respondents None for the Petitioner. Ms. Gunjan Mangla (through VC) a/w Ms. Tithi Jakhadi, for the Intervenor in IA(ST)/3486/2025. Mr. Vinod Chate, APP for the Respondent-State. CORAM: SHYAM C. CHANDAK, J. DATED : 21st SEPTEMBER, 2026 P.C. :- 1. Mentioned out of turn. 2. Ms. Mangla, learned Counsel for the Intervenor states that the aforesaid Writ Petition has become infructuous because, the Investigation Agency has submitted a closure report in the FIR. 3. As a result, Writ Petition stands disposed of as infructuous. 4. In view of the disposal of the Writ Petition No.3305 of 2025, Interim Application (ST) No.3486 of 2025 does not survive and is disposed of, accordingly. (SHYAM C. CHANDAK, J.) WAKLE MANOJ JANARDHAN Digitally signed by WAKLE MANOJ JANARDHAN Date: 2026.09.22 19:05:26 +0530