HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 16003 of 2026 Court No. - 6 HON'BLE SIDDHARTH NANDAN, J. 1. Heard Shri Bhanu Pratap Singh, learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Standing Counsel for the respondent-State and Shri Rakesh Kumar Gupta, learned counsel for the respondent nos. 2, 3 and 4. 2. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioners is that though the payment has been made for the arrears of salary but the interest component has not been released. 3. Shri Rakesh Kumar Gupta, learned counsel for the respondent-University submits that the grievance of the petitioners qua non-payment of interest on the delayed arrears can more appropriately be addressed by the Vice-Chancellor of the University (respondent No.2); and he has no objection in case direction is issued for expeditious disposal of the fresh representation to be moved by the petitioners, and the same shall be considered in accordance with law. 4. In view of the aforesaid, no fruitful purpose would be served in keeping the aforesaid writ petition pending and by the consent of the parties, the writ petition is being decided at the admission stage, directing the petitioners to file a fresh representation before the respondent no.2 within 7 days from Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Bhanu Pratap Singh, Surendra Sharma Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Rakesh Kumar Gupta Ashok Singh @ Ashok Kumar And 3 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) today, along with the certified copy of this order; and in the event such a representation is filed by the petitioners within the said period, it is expected that the respondent no.2 shall consider and decide the same expeditiously, preferably within a period of next 2 Months. 5. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the writ petition stands disposed off. September 30, 2026 Sumit K. WRIA No. 16003 of 2026 2 (Siddharth Nandan,J.) Digitally signed by :- SUMIT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad