Krishnan v. The State Rep by, The Inspector of Police,
CRL OP/11853/2026 · 2026-05-07
L Victoria Gowri
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 9986 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 9986 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRL OP No. 11853 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 07-05-2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI CRL OP No. 11853 of 2026
1. Krishnan
2. Vellaiyan @ Mahesh
3. Ayyanar @ Iyyanar
4. Chinnaraj @ Chinraj
5. Ayyanar
6. Prabu
7. Vengatachalam @ Venkatasalam
8. Manikandan Petitioner(s) Vs The State Rep by, The Inspector of Police, Thirukoilur Police Station, Kallakurichi District. Crime No.196 of 2026 Respondent(s) PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of BNSS Act, to enlarge the petitioners on bail in the event of their arrest in connection with Crime No. 196 of 2026 on the file of the Respondent Police and thus render justice. For Petitioner(s): Mr.R.Rajesh For Respondent(s): Mr.A.Gopinath Government Advocate (Crl.Side) 1 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP No. 11853 of 2026 ORDER The petitioners, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 296(b), 115(2), 118(1), 351(3) of BNS in connection with Crime No.196 of 2026, registered on the file of the respondent, seek anticipatory bail. 2. The allegation against the petitioners is that, due to previous enmity, on 23.04.2026, the petitioners abused the de facto complainant’s son and his mother using filthy language. When the same was questioned, the petitioners/accused attacked the de facto complainant’s son, thereby causing injuries. Hence, the case. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are the innocent persons and have been falsely implicated in the case. Hence, he prays for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 4. The learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondent police reiterated the prosecution case and submitted that the petitioners attacked the de facto complainant’s son and that the injured has been discharged from the hospital. However, he opposed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP No. 11853 of 2026
5. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) for respondent and also perused the materials available on record. 6. Considering the above facts and circumstances of the case and the nature of the allegation and further taking note of the fact that the injured has been discharged from the hospital, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions. 7.
Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date on which the order copy made ready, before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Thirukoilur, on condition that the petitioners shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each with two sureties, each for a like sum, to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed and on further condition that: [a] the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity; 3 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP No. 11853 of 2026 [b] the petitioners shall report before the respondent Police everyday at 10.30 a.m., for a period of one month and thereafter, as and when required for interrogation; [c] the petitioners shall not abscond during during investigation or trial; [d] the petitioners shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial; [e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]; [f] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of B.N.S. 07-05-2026 Jd Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP No. 11853 of 2026 To
1. Judicial Magistrate, Thirukoilur. 2. The Inspector of Police, Thirukoilur Police Station, Kallakurichi District. Crime No.196 of 2026
3.
The Public Prosecutor, Madras High Court, Chennai. 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP No. 11853 of 2026 L.VICTORIA GOWRI J. jd CRL OP No. 11853 of 2026
07-05-2026 6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis