Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9986 (CHH)

PRAHLAD SINGH AGARIYA v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/3476/2026 · 2026-04-21

Shri Parth Prateem Sahu

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:18318 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 3476 of 2026 1 - Prahlad Singh Agariya S/o Late Kunwar Singh Agariya Aged About 66 Years R/o Chilphi Post Chilphi, Tahsil Bodala, Distt. Kabirdham Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Public Works Department, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 2 - Superintendeing Engineer Public Works Department Durg, Circle Durg Chhattisgarh 3 - Executive Engineer P W D Kawardha Division, District Kabirdham Chhattisgarh 4 - Treasury Officer Account And Pension, Kawardha, District Kabirdham Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) 2 For Petitioner(s) : Mr. R.L. Rajak, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Ms. Apurva Nigam, Panel Lawyer Hon’ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu Order on Board 22/04/2026 1. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners who stood retired as Work Charged and Contingency Paid Employees are entitled for leave encashment but till date respondents have not extended the benefit of leave encashment to petitioners. Identical issue came up for hearing before this Court in case of Faguvaram Patel and ors. Vs. State of C.G. in WPS No. 3870 of 2021 decided on 30.09.2022, wherein petitioners have raised identical issue which was allowed in their favour. He submits that at this stage, petitioners may be permitted to submit representation in light of Faguvaram Patel (supra) and respondents be directed to decide the representation to be submitted by petitioners expeditiously within specified time. 2. Learned state counsel submits that as petitioners are not pressing this petition on merits and are only seeking a direction to decide the representation to be submitted by petitioners, at this stage, he is having no objection. 3. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the documents available on record. 3 4. Taking into consideration the limited prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, this petition is disposed of in light of Faguvaram Patel (supra) and the petitioners are at liberty to make representation. In the event, petitioners submit representation, their claim shall be considered and decided in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of 3 months from the date of receipt of representation keeping in mind decision in case of Faguvaram Patel (supra). 5. Accordingly, this petition is disposed of with aforesaid observation and direction. SD/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) JUDGE Madhurima