[2026:RJ-JP:26336] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8957/2026 URN: CRLMB / 16438U / 2026 Mausam S/o Kasam, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Tayra, Police Station Kaman, District Deeg. (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Deeg). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mukesh Dudi For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 13/07/2026 1. The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.24/2026 registered at Police Station Pahari, District Deeg for offences under Section 309(6) of BNS, 2023. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. It is further submitted that the petitioner is facing allegations of having committed robbery pursuant to which the present complaint has been filed. No recovery has been effected from the petitioner, and no Test Identification Parade has been conducted. The co-accused persons, namely Saukin and Jakir Husain, have already been enlarged on bail by this Hon’ble Court vide order dated [2026:RJ-JP:26336] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-8957/2026] 29.04.2026. The petitioner has been in judicial custody since 10.05.2026. Though seven criminal antecedents have been reported against the petitioner, he has already been granted bail in all the said cases. Charge-sheet has been filed. The trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody, consequently, the bail application deserves to be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in light of submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner. 6. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner Mausam S/o Kasam, be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J 96/Arun