Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9985 (MAD)

Pushpa v. State Rep. by The Inspector of Police,

CRL OP/5843/2026 · 2026-03-12

C Kumarappan

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRL OP No. 5843 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 12-03-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN CRL OP No. 5843 of 2026 1. Pushpa W/o. Joseph, No.55, 51 EVP Park Avenue, lyyapnthangal, PoonamaIti, Kancheepuram District. 2. Vethamaheshwari No.1, Nehru Street,Palavanthangal,Kancheepuram District. ..Petitioner(s) Vs State Rep. by The Inspector of Police, Anti Vice Sqaud, Avadi ln Cr.No.05 of 2026 ..Respondent(s) PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of BNSS, 2023, to grant Anticipatory bait to the Petitioners, in the event of their arrest, concerned in Crime No. 05 of 2026, on the file of the Respondent police on such terms and conditions and as this Honble court may deem fit and proper and thus render justice. For Petitioner(s): R.Parthiban For Respondent(s): Mr.P.Dhileepan Government Advocate (Crl.Side) https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 5843 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 ORDER The petitioners who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 3(2)(a), 4(1), 5(1)(a) of ITP Act in Crime No.05 of 2026, on the file of the respondent Police, seeks anticipatory bail. 2. The case of the prosecution is that on 25.02.2026, on receipt of a secret information, the respondent Police has conducted a raid at “Aathiya Ayurvedic Center”, wherein, they found that the accused had made the 3 victims to indulge in prostitution. Hence the case. 3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are an innocent person and have been falsely implicated in this case. The petitioners are ready and willing to abide by any conditions that may be imposed by this Court hence, he prays to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 4. Learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent police reiterated the prosecution case and opposed the grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 5843 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 5.Considering the nature of the allegations against the petitioners and the forceful trafficking of the victims, this Court is of the view that the petitioners do not deserve any anticipatory bail. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed. 12-03-2026 MPA To 1.The Inspector of Police, Anti Vice Sqaud, Avadi ln Cr.No.05 of 2026 2.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 5843 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 C.KUMARAPPAN, J. MPA CRL OP No. 5843 of 2026 12-03-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis