- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:24587 RSA No. 308 of 2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.308 OF 2010 (SP) BETWEEN: 1. SHRI. RAMANNA SINCE DEAD BY HIS LRS 1(a) SHRI VENKATESHAPPA S/O LATE RAMANNA AGE ABOUT 57 YEARS 1(b) SHRI R CHANDRAPPA S/O LATE RAMANNA AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS 1(c) SHRI R KRISHNAPPA S/O LATE RAMANNA AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS 1(d) SHRI R NAGARAJAPPA S/O LATE RAMANNA AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS 1(e) SHRI R NARAYANASWAMY S/O LATE RAMANNA AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS NO.1(a) to 1(e) ARE R/AT GOPASANDRA VILLAGE TEKAL HOBLI, MALUR TALUK-563 130 1(f) SMT PADMAMMA D/O LATE RAMANNA Digitally signed by MALATESH K C Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:24587 RSA No. 308 of 2010 AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS R/AT KEMPANAHALLI VILLAGE TEKAL HOBLI, MALUR TALUK-563 130 1(g) SMT SHAKUNTALA D/O RAMANNA AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS R/AT JANGANAHALLI VILLAGE TEKAL HOBLI, MALUR TALUK – 563 130 …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. V VISWANATH SETTY, ADVOCATE) AND: SMT. SUSHEELAMMA W/O RAMAPPA MAJOR R/AT HALEBALLAHALLI VILLAGE TEKAL, MALUR TALUK-563 130 …RESPONDENT (BY SRI B N MURALIDHAR, ADVOCATE) THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 30.10.2009 PASSED IN R.A.No.153/2002 ON THE FILE OF THE II ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE (SR.DN) KOLAR, PARTLY ALLOWING THE APPEAL AND SETTING ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 10.7.2002 PASSED IN O.S.NO.308/1994 ON THE FILE OF THE ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE (JR.DN) MALUR. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR REPORTING SETTLEMENT, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:24587 RSA No. 308 of 2010 ORAL JUDGMENT Compromise petition is filed under Order 23 Rule 3 of Code of Civil Procedure signed by the parties and their respective advocates along with original General Power of Attorney. 2. Contents of the compromise memo are explained to the parties. 3. On behalf of the appellants, General Power of Attorney holder of appellant Nos.2 to 7 present before the Court and he has signed the compromise petition. 4. On enquiry, parties agreed that the terms of the compromise petition depict true terms of settlement and there is no force, undue influence or coercion in reaching out the terms of the compromise. 5. Accordingly, there is no impediment for this Court to place the compromise petition on record and dispose of the appeal. - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:24587 RSA No. 308 of 2010 6. Hence, the following: ORDER (i) Appeal stands disposed of in terms of the compromise petition. (ii) Office is directed to pass the modified decree in terms of the compromise petition appending the copy of the compromise petition as part of the decree. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE MR List No.: 2 Sl No.: 0