2026:JHHC:804 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No.58 of 2026 ----- Krishna Kinker Das, S/o Late Bhawesh Chandra Das, R/o Mohalla- Naya Tola, P.O. + P.S. Banka, District- Banka, Bihar .... Petitioner(s). Versus 1.The State of Jharkhand through its Secretary, Department of Scheduled Tribe, Scheduled Caste, Minority and Backward Class Welfare at Ranchi, P.O., P.S. and District- Ranchi, Jharkhand 2.The Director, Department of Scheduled Tribe, Scheduled Caste, Minority and Backward Class Welfare at Ranchi, P.O., P.S. and District- Ranchi, Jharkhand 3.Deputy Secretary, Department of Scheduled Tribe, Scheduled Caste, Minority and Backward Class Welfare at Ranchi, P.O., P.S. and District- Ranchi, Jharkhand 4.Joint Secretary, Department of Scheduled Tribe, Scheduled Caste, Minority and Backward Class Welfare at Ranchi, P.O., P.S. and District- Ranchi, Jharkhand 5.The Deputy Commissioner cum District Magistrate, Department of Scheduled Tribe, Scheduled Caste, Minority and Backward Class Welfare Deoghar, P.O., P.S. and District- Deoghar, Jharkhand 6.District Welfare Officer, Deoghar, P.O., P.S. and District- Deoghar, Jharkhand … Respondent(s) ------ CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------ For the Petitioner(s) : Ms. Sadhna Kumar, Advocate For the State : Ms. Ruchi Mukti, AC to AAG-IA …...... 02/ 13.01.2026: Heard, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. 2. It is the case of the petitioner that in the entire service career, he has not been promoted nor has been granted the benefit of ACP/MACP. 3. Learned counsel for the State submits that if the petitioner files a representation before the Deputy Commissioner, his case will be considered and an appropriate will be passed and if it is found that the petitioner is entitled for the benefit, the same will be extended. 4. I direct the petitioner to file a fresh representation before respondent No.5- the Deputy Commissioner cum District Magistrate, Department of Scheduled Tribe, Scheduled Caste, Minority and Backward Class Welfare at Deoghar within a period of four weeks, who will consider the claim of the petitioner within six weeks thereafter and if it is necessary to place the case before any committee or any authority, the same should be place during the said period. Thereafter, if it found that the petitioner is entitled for the benefit, the benefit should be extended to the petitioner and if it is found necessary, the pension and other benefit will also be revised pursuant to the order within four weeks thereafter. 5. If any part of the claim of the petitioner is rejected, the reasons thereof should be communicated to the petitioner within the aforesaid period. 6. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the instant writ petition stands disposed of. (ANANDA SEN, J.) 13th January, 2026 R.S./ Uploaded on 14 /01/2026.