Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9984 (RAJ)

RAMKESH MEENA S/O SHRI RAMSINGH MEENA, v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMP/3158/2024 · 2026-07-13

Anoop Kumar Dhand

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:26199] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 3158/2024 URN: CRLMP / 6500U / 2024 Ramkesh Meena S/o Shri Ramsingh Meena, R/o Kaneti, Raini, District Alwar ----Complainant-Petitioner Versus 1. State of Rajasthan, through Public Prosecutor 2. Director General of Police, Police Headquarter, Lalkothi, Jaipur 3. Superintendent of Police, Alwar 4. S.H.O Police Station Rajgarh, District Alwar ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr.Mohar Pal Meena For Respondent(s) : Mr.Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, PP JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 13/07/2026 1. By way of filing the instant criminal misc. petition, a prayer has been made for issuing directions to the Investigating Agency for conducting fair and impartial investigation in the FIR No.71/2024, registered at the Police Station Rajgarh (Alwar), District Alwar for the offences punishable under Sections 302, 364, 379 & 34 IPC. 2. Learned counsel for the complainant-petitioner submits that the impugned FIR was registered by the complainant-petitioner for the above stated offences at the Police Station Rajgarh (Alwar), District Alwar on 13.02.2024, but inspite of passing of considerable time, till date, the matter has not been investigated [2026:RJ-JP:26199] (2 of 3) [CRLMP-3158/2024] in a fair and impartial manner, therefore, a direction has been issued to the concerned Investigating Officer to do the same in a fair and impartial way. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor opposed the prayer made by counsel for the complainant-petitioner. 4. Heard and considered the submissions made at the Bar and perused the material available on record. 5. Considering the argument put forward by learned counsel for the petitioner and looking to the fact that the impugned F.I.R. was registered more than two and half years ago for the offences stated above. It appears that before approaching this Court, the petitioner submitted a detailed comprehensive representation with regard to redressal of his grievances before the Superintendent of Police, Alwar on 01.04.2024, but the same was not decided by him, hence, under such circumstances, the petitioner has approached this Court by way of filing the instant petition. 6. Considering overall facts and circumstances of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to dispose of the instant criminal misc. petition, granting liberty to the petitioner to file one more detailed comprehensive representation before the Superintendent of Police, Alwar and the concerned Investigating Officer. 7. In case, the such representation is submitted, it is expected from the concerned Authorities to look into the same and proceed with the investigation in accordance with law and make all possible endeavours to submit the conclusion report of the investigation under Section 173 Cr.P.C. before the concerned Court, expeditiously, as early as possible, as the matter pertains to the year 2024. [2026:RJ-JP:26199] (3 of 3) [CRLMP-3158/2024] 8. With the aforesaid observations, the instant criminal misc. petition stands disposed of. Stay application as well as all pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Aayush Sharma/12